Literature DB >> 26629092

Role of multi-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis of level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions and Logistic regression model.

Xiaoling Leng1, Guofu Huang2, Lanhui Yao3, Fucheng Ma4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study is to investigate the diagnostic role of multi-mode ultrasound in level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions and to establish a Logistic regression model.
METHODS: Totally 179 patients with 182 sites of breast lesions were enrolled in this study. Preoperatively, the examinations of routine ultrasonography, elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and three-dimensional color Doppler were performed. Postoperatively, the breast lesions were diagnosed as benign and malignant lesions according to pathological results. Diagnostic indicators of each ultrasound analysis were determined and compared. The relationship between these diagnostic indicators and the benign and malignant features of breast lesions was analyzed by single factor analysis. Logistic regression model was established.
RESULTS: The diagnostic indicators with high sensitivity and specificity were tumor edge, enhanced range and score of elastography. Four factors of tumor edge, enhanced order, contrast mode and score of elastography were related with the benign and malignant features of breast lesions. The prediction model was Logit (P) = 0.636 + 4.471X1 + 4.337X2 + 3.753X3 + 3.014X4 + 2.525X5 + 2.105X6. Likelihood ratio test showed that the model was statistically significant (χ(2) = 161.876, P < 0.0001). This model could effectively distinguish between benign and malignant tumors (R(2) = 0.813, prediction accuracy 92.3%). The differences in sensitivity and specificity between multi-mode ultrasound diagnosis and routine ultrasound diagnosis were statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between Logistic regression model and multi-mode ultrasound diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Multi-mode ultrasound and Logistic regression model are more effective in diagnosing level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS 4 level; Breast neoplasms; multi-mode ultrasound diagnosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26629092      PMCID: PMC4658981     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  16 in total

1.  Imaging results of multi-modal ultrasound computerized tomography system designed for breast diagnosis.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Opieliński; Piotr Pruchnicki; Tadeusz Gudra; Przemysław Podgórski; Jacek Kurcz; Tomasz Kraśnicki; Marek Sąsiadek; Jarosław Majewski
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Hongmei Zeng; Siwei Zhang; Jie He
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Qiao Hu; Xiao Yan Wang; Shang Yong Zhu; Li Ke Kang; Yan Ju Xiao; Hong Yu Zheng
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.

Authors:  J Heinig; R Witteler; R Schmitz; L Kiesel; J Steinhard
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  [Displacement margins and edge contour: informative criteria of tumor dignity in ultrasound mammography].

Authors:  K L Marquet; A Funk; S Handt; H Fendel; U Heindrichs; W Rath
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 6.  Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: revisited.

Authors:  Catherine F Cowell; Britta Weigelt; Rita A Sakr; Charlotte K Y Ng; James Hicks; Tari A King; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 7.  The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Raghu Kalluri; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Yu-Xin Jiang; He Liu; Ji-Bin Liu; Qing-Li Zhu; Qiang Sun; Xiao-Yan Chang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 9.  Clinical relevance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring anti-angiogenic therapy of cancer: current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Michele Lamuraglia; S Lori Bridal; Mathieu Santin; Gianni Izzi; Olivier Rixe; Angelo Paradiso; Olivier Lucidarme
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.

Authors:  Hongjia Zhao; Rong Xu; Qiufang Ouyang; Lidian Chen; Baowei Dong; Ye Huihua
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis?

Authors:  Gang Liu; Meng-Ke Zhang; Yan He; Yuan Liu; Xi-Ru Li; Zhi-Li Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

2.  Mammography breast density: an effective supplemental modality for the precise grading of ultrasound BI-RADS 4 categories.

Authors:  Wei-Min Li; Qiu-Wei Sun; Xiao-Fang Fan; Jun-Chao Zhang; Ting Xu; Qi-Qi Shen; Lei Jia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.