Literature DB >> 23862835

Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Andrea Trevino1, Jont B Allen.   

Abstract

The consonant recognition of 17 ears with sensorineural hearing loss is evaluated for 14 consonants /p, t, k, f, s, ∫, b, d, g, v, z, 3, m, n/+/a/, under four speech-weighted noise conditions (0, 6, 12 dB SNR, quiet). One male and one female talker were chosen for each consonant, resulting in 28 total consonant-vowel test tokens. For a given consonant, tokens by different talkers were observed to systematically differ, in both the robustness to noise and/or the resulting confusion groups. Such within-consonant token differences were observed for over 60% of the tested consonants and all HI ears. Only when HI responses are examined on an individual token basis does one find that the error may be limited to a small subset of tokens with confusion groups that are restricted to fewer than three confusions on average. Averaging different tokens of the same consonant can raise the entropy of a listener's responses (i.e., the size of the confusion group), causing the listener to appear to behave in a less systematic way. Quantifying these token differences provides insight into HI perception of speech under noisy conditions and characterizes each listener's hearing impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23862835      PMCID: PMC3732204          DOI: 10.1121/1.4807474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Dimensions of consonant perception in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B E Walden; A A Montgomery
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1975-09

3.  A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Andrea Trevino; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Identification of voiceless fricatives by high frequency hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  D L Lawrence; V W Byers
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1969-06

5.  Consonant errors and remediation in sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  E Owens
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1978-08

6.  Frequency of occurrence of phonemes in conversational English.

Authors:  M A Mines; B F Hanson; J E Shoup
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1978 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Improving the reliability of speech audiometry.

Authors:  J D Hood; J P Poole
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1977-11

8.  Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  R C Bilger; M D Wang
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1976-12

9.  A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions.

Authors:  M D Wang; C M Reed; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-03

10.  Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation.

Authors:  M W Skinner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Marjorie R Leek; Judy R Dubno; David J Wark; Pamela E Souza; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.

Authors:  Ali Abavisani; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Blythe Vickery; Daniel Fogerty; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.