Literature DB >> 11008825

Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

A Jongman1, R Wayland, S Wong.   

Abstract

This study constitutes a large-scale comparative analysis of acoustic cues for classification of place of articulation in fricatives. To date, no single metric has been found to classify fricative place of articulation with a high degree of accuracy. This study presents spectral, amplitudinal, and temporal measurements that involve both static properties (spectral peak location, spectral moments, noise duration, normalized amplitude, and F2 onset frequency) and dynamic properties (relative amplitude and locus equations). While all cues (except locus equations) consistently serve to distinguish sibilant from nonsibilant fricatives, the present results indicate that spectral peak location, spectral moments, and both normalized and relative amplitude serve to distinguish all four places of fricative articulation. These findings suggest that these static and dynamic acoustic properties can provide robust and unique information about all four places of articulation, despite variation in speaker, vowel context, and voicing.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008825     DOI: 10.1121/1.1288413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  97 in total

1.  Evaluating the spectral distinction between sibilant fricatives through a speaker-centered approach.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Elizabeth Seelinger; Kerry Callahan Mandulak; David J Zajac
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

2.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: a cross-language acoustic study.

Authors:  Fangfang Li
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-04-27

4.  Horizontal directivity of low- and high-frequency energy in speech and singing.

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Eric J Hunter; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stop-like modification of the dental fricative /ð/: an acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Sherry Y Zhao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

10.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.