Literature DB >> 642487

A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions.

M D Wang, C M Reed, R C Bilger.   

Abstract

It has been found that listeners with sensorineural hearing loss who show similar patterns of consonant confusions also tend to have similar audiometric profiles. The present study determined whether normal listeners, presented with filtered speech, would produce consonant confusions similar to those previously reported for the hearing-impaired listener. Consonant confusion matrices were obtained from eight normal-hearing subjects for four sets of CV and VC nonsense syllables presented under six high-pass and six-low pass filtering conditions. Patterns of consonant confusion for each condition were described using phonological features in sequential information analysis. Severe low-pass filtering produced consonant confusions comparable to those of listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Severe high-pass filtering gave a result comparable to that of patients with flat or rising audiograms. And, mild filtering resulted in confusion patterns comparable to those of listeners with essentially normal hearing. An explanation in terms of the spectrum, the level of speech, and the configuration of this individual listener's audiogram is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 642487     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2101.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech-cue transmission by an algorithm to increase consonant recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; Frédéric Apoux; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Separating the redundancy of voicing from nasality in American English.

Authors:  J M Stewart; C M Barach
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1987-01

4.  Evaluating hearing aid amplification using idiosyncratic consonant errors.

Authors:  Ali Abavisani; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Jont B Allen; David M Gooler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Sangsook Choi; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lip-reading aids word recognition most in moderate noise: a Bayesian explanation using high-dimensional feature space.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Xiang Zhou; Lars A Ross; John J Foxe; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.