Literature DB >> 23039459

A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise.

Feipeng Li1, Andrea Trevino, Anjali Menon, Jont B Allen.   

Abstract

In a previous study on plosives, the 3-Dimensional Deep Search (3DDS) method for the exploration of the necessary and sufficient cues for speech perception was introduced (Li et al., (2010). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(4), 2599-2610). Here, this method is used to isolate the spectral cue regions for perception of the American English fricatives /∫, 3, s, z, f, v, θ, δ in time, frequency, and intensity. The fricatives are analyzed in the context of consonant-vowel utterances, using the vowel /α/. The necessary cues were found to be contained in the frication noise for /∫, 3, s, z, f, v/. 3DDS analysis isolated the cue regions of /s, z/ between 3.6 and 8 [kHz] and /∫, 3/ between 1.4 and 4.2 [kHz]. Some utterances were found to contain acoustic components that were unnecessary for correct perception, but caused listeners to hear non-target consonants when the primary cue region was removed; such acoustic components are labeled "conflicting cue regions." The amplitude modulation of the high-frequency frication region by the fundamental F0 was found to be a sufficient cue for voicing. Overall, the 3DDS method allows one to analyze the effects of natural speech components without initial assumptions about where perceptual cues lie in time-frequency space or which elements of production they correspond to.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039459      PMCID: PMC3477194          DOI: 10.1121/1.4747008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.

Authors:  Riya Singh; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A psychoacoustic method to find the perceptual cues of stop consonants in natural speech.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consonant confusions in white noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Andrew Lovitt; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.

Authors:  Søren Jørgensen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Property detectors for bursts and transitions in speech perception.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens; G N Nigro
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues.

Authors:  R E Remez; P E Rubin; D B Pisoni; T D Carrell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Auditory "bubbles": Efficient classification of the spectrotemporal modulations essential for speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Gregory Hickok; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Attention selectively modulates cortical entrainment in different regions of the speech spectrum.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Cort Horton; Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Enhancement of Consonant Recognition in Bimodal and Normal Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Britteny Riley; Henna Patel; Amanda Frost; Paul Fillmore; Rene Gifford; John Hansen
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 5.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A psychophysical imaging method evidencing auditory cue extraction during speech perception: a group analysis of auditory classification images.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Kenneth Knoblauch; Willy Serniclaes; Fanny Meunier; Michel Hoen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of the intensified frequency and time ranges on consonant enhancement in bilateral cochlear implant and hearing aid users.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Yoon; Carrie Drew
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.