Literature DB >> 692099

Consonant errors and remediation in sensorineural hearing loss.

E Owens.   

Abstract

An analysis of consonant errors for hearing-impaired subjects in a multiple-choice format revealed that about 14 consonants caused most of the difficulty in consonant recognition. For a given consonant, error probability was typically lower in the initial position of the stimulus word than in the final position. When errors were made, the substitutions were limited typically to two or three other consonants, with a greater variety occurring for consonants in the final position. Substitutions tended to be the same over a wide range of pure-tone configurations. Place errors were predominant, but manner errors also occurred. In only a few instances did specific relationships occur between particular stimulus consonants and pure-tone configurations. With knowledge of the error consonants and typical substitutions, auditory recognition of consonants can be improved by programmed instruction methods. Shaping can be accomplished by a manipulation of the response foils (choices). Since it has been shown that visual recognition of consonants can also be improved, advantage can be taken of both the visual and auditory modalities in remedial procedures. Frequency of usage in the language should be considered in the ordering of consonants for retraining purposes. Work in consonant recognition should be beneficial to the hearing-impaired patient as part of a total rehabilitation program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 692099     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.4303.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  5 in total

1.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Chloé Langlet; Christian Lorenzi; Diane S Lazard; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.