Literature DB >> 28464618

Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.

James D Miller1, Charles S Watson1, Marjorie R Leek2, Judy R Dubno3, David J Wark4, Pamela E Souza5, Sandra Gordon-Salant6, Jayne B Ahlstrom3.   

Abstract

The abilities of 59 adult hearing-aid users to hear phonetic details were assessed by measuring their abilities to identify syllable constituents in quiet and in differing levels of noise (12-talker babble) while wearing their aids. The set of sounds consisted of 109 frequently occurring syllable constituents (45 onsets, 28 nuclei, and 36 codas) spoken in varied phonetic contexts by eight talkers. In nominal quiet, a speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 40 dB, scores of individual listeners ranged from about 23% to 85% correct. Averaged over the range of SNRs commonly encountered in noisy situations, scores of individual listeners ranged from about 10% to 71% correct. The scores in quiet and in noise were very strongly correlated, R = 0.96. This high correlation implies that common factors play primary roles in the perception of phonetic details in quiet and in noise. Otherwise said, hearing-aid users' problems perceiving phonetic details in noise appear to be tied to their problems perceiving phonetic details in quiet and vice versa.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28464618      PMCID: PMC5848866          DOI: 10.1121/1.4979703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of context effects in sentence recognition.

Authors:  Adelbert W Bronkhorst; Thomas Brand; Kirsten Wagener
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method.

Authors:  C Kaernbach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

3.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.

Authors:  Karolina Smeds; Florian Wolters; Martin Rung
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Across- and within-consonant errors for isolated syllables in noise.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: II. Using SPATS software.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Jill E Preminger; David J Wark
Journal:  Hear J       Date:  2008-10

8.  Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Harvey Fletcher's role in the creation of communication acoustics.

Authors:  J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Frederic L Wightman; Jill E Preminger
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2008-09-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Marjorie R Leek; David J Wark; Pamela E Souza; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ear Asymmetry and Contextual Influences on Speech Perception in Hearing-Impaired Patients.

Authors:  Annie Moulin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.