OBJECTIVES: Primary cusp repair + aortic root reimplantation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease presenting with root aneurysm with aortic insufficiency (AI) is an effective surgical treatment. We assessed whether the geometric orientation of the repaired BAV into its reimplanted neoroot affects outcomes-180°/180° orientation was compared with the 150°/210° orientation. METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 66 BAV repairs were performed. This is a retrospective review of all types of Ib/II BAV AI patients undergoing root reimplantation (n = 26) at two different geometric orientations: 180°/180° (n = 11) vs 150°/210° (n = 15). In the 180°/180° group, reimplantation into the neoroot was such that both conjoint and non-conjoint cusps occupied 180° of the annular circumference. In the 150°/210° group, the repaired valve was configured to the more typical native orientation of a type I BAV: the non-conjoint cusp occupied 150°, and the conjoint cusp occupied 210° of the annular circumference. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. In-hospital mortality, stroke, reoperation, renal failure and pacemaker rates were zero in both groups. No patient left the operating room with >1+ AI and one had a peak gradient >20 mmHg. Transvalvular gradients were higher in the 180°/180° group, but not significant (P > 0.05). M.ean follow-ups for the 180°/180° and 150°/210° group were 48 and 33 months, respectively. Actuarial freedom from AI >2+ at 5 years was 100% in both groups. Freedom from AI >1+ at 5 years was 90 ± 10% in the 150°/210° group and 86 ± 13% in the 180°/180° group (P = 0.71). Freedom from peak gradient >20 mmHg was 80% (n = 8) in the 180°/180° group and 100% in the 150°/210° group at 1-year follow-up. Transvalvular gradients were higher in the 180°/180° group (16 ± 8 vs 10 ± 4 mmHg, P = 0.02; 9 ± 3 vs 5 ± 3 mmHg, P = 0.01). Five-year actuarial survival and freedom from aortic reoperation have remained at 100% in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Cusp repair + root reimplantation for BAV type Ib/II AI can be safely performed at either geometric orientation. Conceptually, 150°/210° orientation respects the natural type I BAV anatomy with regard to cusp surface area and leaflet insertion perimeter. The 180°/180° group may have higher transvalvular gradients and smaller coaptation zones than the 150°/210° group. Further follow-up may reveal the superiority of one geometric orientation over the other.
OBJECTIVES: Primary cusp repair + aortic root reimplantation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease presenting with root aneurysm with aortic insufficiency (AI) is an effective surgical treatment. We assessed whether the geometric orientation of the repaired BAV into its reimplanted neoroot affects outcomes-180°/180° orientation was compared with the 150°/210° orientation. METHODS: From 2005 to 2012, 66 BAV repairs were performed. This is a retrospective review of all types of Ib/II BAV AI patients undergoing root reimplantation (n = 26) at two different geometric orientations: 180°/180° (n = 11) vs 150°/210° (n = 15). In the 180°/180° group, reimplantation into the neoroot was such that both conjoint and non-conjoint cusps occupied 180° of the annular circumference. In the 150°/210° group, the repaired valve was configured to the more typical native orientation of a type I BAV: the non-conjoint cusp occupied 150°, and the conjoint cusp occupied 210° of the annular circumference. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. In-hospital mortality, stroke, reoperation, renal failure and pacemaker rates were zero in both groups. No patient left the operating room with >1+ AI and one had a peak gradient >20 mmHg. Transvalvular gradients were higher in the 180°/180° group, but not significant (P > 0.05). M.ean follow-ups for the 180°/180° and 150°/210° group were 48 and 33 months, respectively. Actuarial freedom from AI >2+ at 5 years was 100% in both groups. Freedom from AI >1+ at 5 years was 90 ± 10% in the 150°/210° group and 86 ± 13% in the 180°/180° group (P = 0.71). Freedom from peak gradient >20 mmHg was 80% (n = 8) in the 180°/180° group and 100% in the 150°/210° group at 1-year follow-up. Transvalvular gradients were higher in the 180°/180° group (16 ± 8 vs 10 ± 4 mmHg, P = 0.02; 9 ± 3 vs 5 ± 3 mmHg, P = 0.01). Five-year actuarial survival and freedom from aortic reoperation have remained at 100% in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Cusp repair + root reimplantation for BAV type Ib/II AI can be safely performed at either geometric orientation. Conceptually, 150°/210° orientation respects the natural type I BAV anatomy with regard to cusp surface area and leaflet insertion perimeter. The 180°/180° group may have higher transvalvular gradients and smaller coaptation zones than the 150°/210° group. Further follow-up may reveal the superiority of one geometric orientation over the other.
Authors: Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise; Rick A Nishimura; Blase A Carabello; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; Bruce W Lytle; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Pravin M Shah Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Alessio Basciu; Enrico Citterio; Antioco Cappai; Diego Ornaghi; Giuseppe Tarelli; Fabrizio Settepani Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2012-03-02
Authors: Patrick J Nash; Eugene Vitvitsky; Jianbo Li; Delos M Cosgrove; Gosta Pettersson; Richard A Grimm Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Annie Robert; Agnès Pasquet; Bernhard L Gerber; Philippe Noirhomme; Gébrine El Khoury; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-08
Authors: Gruschen R Veldtman; Heidi M Connolly; Thomas A Orszulak; Joseph A Dearani; Hartzell V Schaff Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: C D Fraser; N Wang; R B Mee; B W Lytle; P M McCarthy; S K Sapp; E R Rosenkranz; D M Cosgrove Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Joel Price; Laurent De Kerchove; David Glineur; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde; Philippe Noirhomme; Gebrine El Khoury Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jan Nijs; Babs Vangelder; Kaoru Tanaka; Sandro Gelsomino; Ines Van Loo; Mark La Meir; Jos Maessen; Bas L J H Kietselaer Journal: JTCVS Tech Date: 2021-08-27