Literature DB >> 29286413

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement.

Reza Tavakoli1, Guillaume Lebreton2, Max Gassmann3, Peiman Jamshidi4, Pascal Leprince2.   

Abstract

Despite the obvious advantages of the preservation of a normal aortic valve during aortic root replacement, the complexity of valve sparing procedures prevents a number of cardiac surgeons from incorporating them into their practice. The aim of this protocol is to describe a simplified and user-friendly technique of an aortic valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) procedure by re-implantation of the aortic valve. Proper selection of patients and limitations of the technique are discussed. In 54 consecutive patients, normal appearing aortic valves were re-implanted in a commercially available polyester prosthesis with pre-shaped sinuses by a simplified and standardized technique. Placement of the first row of the proximal suture line, choice of the prosthesis size, and adjustment of the height of the commissures of the patient to the fixed height of the sinus portion of the prosthesis were slightly modified from the reference techniques with the aim of increasing its feasibility for use by other cardiac surgeons. Early mortality and morbidity as well as 5-year survival, freedom from aortic valve reoperation, and freedom from recurrent moderate regurgitation were collected in all patients. Thirty-day mortality, re-sternotomy for bleeding, re-sternotomy for mediastinitis, and the incidence of stroke were very low, 1.8% for each (1 of 54). No patient required permanent pace-maker implantation. At 5 years, survival, freedom from aortic valve reoperation, and freedom from recurrent moderate regurgitation were 97.5%, 95.2%, and 91.6%, respectively. Mid-term results of our standardized technique of re-implantation of the aortic valve for valve-sparing aortic root replacement are very good and compare with more complex techniques reported by experienced surgeons. By following the present protocol of the standardized re-implantation technique, a greater number of cardiac surgeons can perform this procedure with comparable good results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29286413      PMCID: PMC5755561          DOI: 10.3791/56790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  23 in total

1.  Long-term results after aortic valve-sparing operation (David I).

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Hassina Baraki; Ilona Maeding; Sebastian Fitzner; Samir Sarikouch; Nawid Khaladj; Christian Hagl; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  New graft formulation and modification of the David reimplantation technique.

Authors:  Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Aortic prosthetic ring annuloplasty: a useful adjunct to a standardized aortic valve-sparing procedure?

Authors:  Emmanuel Lansac; Isabelle Di Centa; Nicolas Bonnet; Pascal Leprince; Akthar Rama; Christophe Acar; Alain Pavie; Iradj Gandjbakhch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years.

Authors:  Tirone E David; Carolyn M David; Christopher M Feindel; Cedric Manlhiot
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Coronary artery compression by teflon pledget granuloma following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  S D Cohle; J W Delavan
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  Geometric orientation of the aortic neoroot in patients with raphed bicuspid aortic valve disease undergoing primary cusp repair and a root reimplantation procedure.

Authors:  Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Wilson Y Szeto; Caroline M Komlo; Liam P Ryan; Tyler J Wallen; Robert C Gorman; Nimesh D Desai; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots.

Authors:  Reza Tavakoli; Peiman Jamshidi; Max Gassmann
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Aortic root surgery in the United States: a report from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

Authors:  Sotiris C Stamou; Mathew L Williams; Tyler M Gunn; Robert C Hagberg; Kevin W Lobdell; Nicholas T Kouchoukos
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.

Authors:  T E David; C M Feindel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Early results with annular support in reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Diana Aicher; Ulrich Schneider; Wolfram Schmied; Takashi Kunihara; Masato Tochii; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.