Literature DB >> 8067836

Repair of insufficient bicuspid aortic valves.

C D Fraser1, N Wang, R B Mee, B W Lytle, P M McCarthy, S K Sapp, E R Rosenkranz, D M Cosgrove.   

Abstract

A technique for the repair of bicuspid aortic valves that includes resection of the flail segment of the prolapsing leaflet, annuloplasty, and resection of the raphe, when present, has been reported. To assess the efficacy of this technique in the repair of insufficient bicuspid aortic valves, the results in 72 consecutive patients were assessed. The mean age of the patients was 39 +/- 11 years; 94% were male. Fifty-six patients (78%) underwent isolated aortic valve repair, 9 (12.5%) underwent aortic and mitral valve repair, and 7 (9.7%) had other associated procedures. All patients underwent leaflet resection, including 35 (48%) at the raphe. The mean aortic occlusion time was 39 +/- 12 minutes. There were no operative deaths. The severity of aortic insufficiency, as assessed by Doppler echocardiography (graded from 0 to 4) preoperatively and intraoperatively and at late follow-up, was 3.6 +/- 0.6, 0.4 +/- 0.4, and 0.9 +/- 0.8, respectively, with a p value of < 0.0001 for the latter two values versus the preoperative one. There have been no postoperative deaths. Patients did not receive anticoagulation treatment and there were no strokes or episodes of endocarditis. Six patients have required reoperation; 3 underwent repeat repair. The Kaplan-Meier freedom from aortic valve reoperation probabilities at 12 and 24 months were 94% and 89.5%, respectively. We conclude that valvuloplasty for insufficient bicuspid aortic valves is technically safe, is associated with a low incidence of recurrent insufficiency, and has been associated with no other valve-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8067836     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)92212-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Reconstruction of bicuspid aortic valves. Surgical tool or toy?

Authors:  H-J Schäfers
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

Review 2.  Current topics on bicuspid aortic valve: clinical aspects and surgical management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Valvuloplasty for aortic valve regurgitation resulting from cusp prolapse.

Authors:  S Nagamine; S Shinozaki; K Ohsaka; H Kakihata
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-03

4.  Geometric orientation of the aortic neoroot in patients with raphed bicuspid aortic valve disease undergoing primary cusp repair and a root reimplantation procedure.

Authors:  Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Wilson Y Szeto; Caroline M Komlo; Liam P Ryan; Tyler J Wallen; Robert C Gorman; Nimesh D Desai; Joseph E Bavaria
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Management of valvar aortic stenosis in children.

Authors:  J D R Thomson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Surgical techniques for aortic valvuloplasty.

Authors:  C D Fraser; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1994

7.  Novel bicuspid aortic valve model with aortic regurgitation for hemodynamic status analysis using an ex vivo simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Bryant Priromprintr; Hanjay Wang; Haley J Lucian; Justin M Farry; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.