Literature DB >> 23811736

Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Sakineh B Akram1, Veronica Miyasike-daSilva, Karen Van Ooteghem, William E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Onset and execution of compensatory reaches are faster than the most rapid voluntary reaches. With onset latencies near 100 ms, it is proposed that initial control of compensatory reaches cannot rely on visual information obtained after perturbation onset; rather, they rely on a visuospatial map acquired prior to instability. In natural conditions, it is not practical to direct gaze toward every potential support surface in preparation for a perturbation, suggesting that peripheral vision may be uniquely important. This study aimed to determine whether visuospatial mapping achieved using only peripheral visual information could be used to control reach-to-grasp reactions. Participants sat in an unstable chair. Whole body perturbations were used to evoke rapid reach-to-grasp reactions. A handle was positioned at midline or to the right of the participant. Gaze was directed toward the center or right to view the handle in peripheral or central visual fields. Electromyographic and kinematic data were recorded. Peripheral information acquired prior to perturbation was sufficient for successful execution of reach-to-grasp without delay. Differences in reach kinematics, however, did exist between vision conditions (e.g., maximum lateral wrist displacement and magnitude of hand overshoot relative to the handle were greater for peripheral vs. central vision). Handle location led to target-specific differences in initial muscle recruitment revealing information acquired prior to perturbation were used to guide initial limb trajectory. Results reveal the capacity to rely on a visuospatial map constructed from peripheral visual information for compensatory reaching but also highlight limitations leading to more conservative reach trajectories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811736     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3624-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Compensatory stepping: the biomechanics of a preferred response among older adults.

Authors:  J L Jensen; L A Brown; M H Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Growing older does not always mean moving slower: examining aging and the saccadic motor system.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Michael Dodd; Timothy Welsh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Visuomotor memory for target location in near and far reaching spaces.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 7.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

8.  Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; B E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Does the movement matter?: determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Karen Van Ooteghem; Veronica Miyasike-Dasilva; Sakineh Akram; Avril Mansfield; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; David M Cole; Blake Butler; Mahmoud Mansour; Garrett Rydalch; Douglas W McDannald; Sarah E Schwartz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Examining the influence of mental stress on balance perturbation responses in older adults.

Authors:  Ruth Y Akinlosotu; Nesreen Alissa; Shari R Waldstein; Robert A Creath; George F Wittenberg; Kelly P Westlake
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.032

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.