Literature DB >> 15883802

Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

John L Zettel1, Andrea Holbeche, William E McIlroy, Brian E Maki.   

Abstract

In many situations successful execution of a balance-recovery reaction requires visual information about the environment. In particular, reactions that involve rapid limb movements, such as stepping, must be controlled to avoid obstacles and accommodate other constraints on limb trajectory. However, it is unknown whether the central nervous system can acquire the necessary visuospatial information prior to perturbation onset or must, instead, redirect gaze at the floor during the execution of the stepping reaction. To study this we examined gaze behaviour, during rapid forward-directed stepping reactions triggered by unpredictable platform perturbation, in 12 healthy young adults. We also monitored switching of attention, as inferred from onset of significant error in performing a concurrent visuomotor tracking task. Obstacles and/or step targets were used as constraints, to increase demands for accurate foot movement. Downward gaze shifts towards the floor almost never occurred during stepping reactions when foot motion was unconstrained but did occur more frequently as the demands for accurate foot movement increased. Nonetheless, even in the most challenging condition (target plus obstacle), downward redirection of gaze occurred in less than 40% of the trials, and subjects were commonly well able to clear the obstacle and land the foot on the target without redirecting their gaze towards the floor. An apparent switching of attention, subsequent to perturbation onset, occurred frequently (>80% of trials) in all task conditions, independent of the gaze shifts. The findings indicate that visual fixation of the foot or floor was not essential for accurate control of the foot movement, nor was the apparent switching of attention that followed perturbation onset linked, in any consistent way, to overt changes in visual fixation. Spatial features of the support surface were apparently "remembered" prior to perturbation onset, thereby allowing both vision and attention to be directed to other demands during the execution of the balance reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883802     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2310-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Temporal properties of attention sharing consequent to disturbed balance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; R G Norrie; J D Brooke; D C Bishop; A J Nelson; B E Maki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-09-29       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Postural control: visual and cognitive manipulations.

Authors:  M C Hunter; M A Hoffman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Environmental constraints on foot trajectory reveal the capacity for modulation of anticipatory postural adjustments during rapid triggered stepping reactions.

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Can stabilizing features of rapid triggered stepping reactions be modulated to meet environmental constraints?

Authors:  John L Zettel; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visually guided stepping under conditions of step cycle-related denial of visual information.

Authors:  M A Hollands; D E Marple-Horvat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

9.  Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; B E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  15 in total

1.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual guidance of the human foot during a step.

Authors:  Raymond F Reynolds; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Aftab E Patla; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  External postural perturbations induce multiple anticipatory postural adjustments when subjects cannot pre-select their stepping foot.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  The role of neuromuscular changes in aging and knee osteoarthritis on dynamic postural control.

Authors:  Judit Takacs; Mark G Carpenter; S Jayne Garland; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.745

9.  Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Katsuo Fujiwara; Hidehito Tomita; Naoe Furune; Kenji Kunita; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Authors:  Sakineh B Akram; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Karen Van Ooteghem; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.