Literature DB >> 17550869

Visuomotor memory for target location in near and far reaching spaces.

Matthew Heath1, Gordon Binsted.   

Abstract

The authors investigated systematic error associated with endpoints of memory-guided actions performed in near and far reaching spaces. To accomplish that objective, the authors instructed 12 participants to initiate open-loop and memory-guided reaches (0, 2,000, and 5,000 ms of visual delay) from a common start position to remembered midline targets in near (i.e., a backward reach) and far (i.e., a forward reach) reaching spaces. The results indicated that near and far reaches, respectively, over- and undershot veridical target location, and the direction-specific nature of the error was amplified in the memory-guided conditions. The latter finding represents an important aspect of the present research because it suggests that the direction-specific error identified here is related to factors arising within the sensory component of the task rather than mechanical differences in reaching direction. The authors propose that stored target information serving memory guided actions is susceptible to a compression of visual space in memory such that the egocentric distance of a remembered target is underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550869     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.39.3.169-178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  15 in total

1.  Sensory-motor equivalence: manual aiming in C6 tetraplegics following musculotendinous transfer surgery at the elbow.

Authors:  Mark A Robinson; Spencer J Hayes; Simon J Bennett; Gabor J Barton; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brain activation related to combinations of gaze position, visual input, and goal-directed hand movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Min Wu; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Grasping in absence of feedback: systematic biases endure extensive training.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Parietal reach region encodes reach depth using retinal disparity and vergence angle signals.

Authors:  Rajan Bhattacharyya; Sam Musallam; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visuomotor memory is independent of conscious awareness of target features.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Kristina A Neely; Jason Yakimishyn; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Gaze strategies during visually-guided versus memory-guided grasping.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Kinematics of ventrally mediated grasp-to-eat actions: right-hand advantage is dependent on dorsal stream input.

Authors:  Clarissa Beke; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.