Literature DB >> 30974321

Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.

David A E Bolton1, David M Cole2, Blake Butler3, Mahmoud Mansour4, Garrett Rydalch5, Douglas W McDannald3, Sarah E Schwartz6.   

Abstract

The present study explored how motor cortical activity was influenced by visual perception of complex environments that either afforded or obstructed arm and leg reactions in young, healthy adults. Most importantly, we focused on compensatory balance reactions where the arms were required to regain stability following unexpected postural perturbation. Our first question was if motor cortical activity from the hand area automatically corresponds to the visual environment. Affordance-based priming of the motor system was assessed using single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to determine if visual access to a wall-mounted support handle influenced corticospinal excitability. We evaluated if hand actions were automatically facilitated and/or suppressed by viewing an available handle within graspable range. Our second question was if the requirement for rapid movement to recover balance played a role in modulating any affordance effect in the hands. The goal was to disentangle motor demands related to postural threat from the impact of observation alone. For balance trials, a custom-built, lean and release apparatus was used to impose temporally unpredictable postural perturbations. In all balance trials, perturbations were of sufficient magnitude to evoke a compensatory change-in-support response; therefore, any recovery action needed to carefully take into account the affordances and constraints of the perceived environment to prevent a fall. Consistent with our first hypothesis, activity in an intrinsic hand muscle was increased when participants passively viewed a wall-mounted safety handle, in both seated and standing contexts. Contrary to our second hypothesis, this visual priming was absent when perturbations were imposed and the handle was needed to regain balance. Our results reveal that motor set is influenced by simply viewing objects that afford a grasp. We suggest that such preparation may provide an advantage when generating balance recovery actions that require quickly grasping a supportive handle. This priming effect likely competes with other task-dependent influences that regulate cortical motor output. Future studies should expand from limitations inherent with single-pulse TMS alone, to determine if vision of our surrounding world influences motor set in other contexts (e.g., intensified postural threat) and investigate if this priming corresponds to overt behavior.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affordance; Anticipatory set; Corticospinal excitability; Reactive balance; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30974321      PMCID: PMC6650316          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  44 in total

1.  Muscle activities used by young and old adults when stepping to regain balance during a forward fall.

Authors:  D G Thelen; M Muriuki; J James; A B Schultz; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Cortico-spinal inhibition reflects time but not event preparation: neural mechanisms of preparation dissociated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Hasbroucq; A Osman; C A Possamaï; B Burle; S Carron; D Dépy; S Latour; I Mouret
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

Review 3.  Change-in-support reactions for balance recovery.

Authors:  Brian E Maki; William E McIlroy; Geoff R Fernie
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

4.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing.

Authors:  J Grèzes; M Tucker; J Armony; R Ellis; R E Passingham
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Action priming by briefly presented objects.

Authors:  Mike Tucker; Rob Ellis
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-06

6.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.

Authors:  T Kammer; S Beck; A Thielscher; U Laubis-Herrmann; H Topka
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Flexion-reflex of the limb, crossed extension-reflex, and reflex stepping and standing.

Authors:  C S Sherrington
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1910-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Preventing falls in older adults: new interventions to promote more effective change-in-support balance reactions.

Authors:  Brian E Maki; Kenneth C-C Cheng; Avril Mansfield; Carol Y Scovil; Stephen D Perry; Amy L Peters; Sandra McKay; Tracy Lee; Aaron Marquis; Philippe Corbeil; Geoff R Fernie; Barbara Liu; William E McIlroy
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Age and gender differences in single-step recovery from a forward fall.

Authors:  L A Wojcik; D G Thelen; A B Schultz; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  2 in total

1.  Negative affordance effect: automatic response inhibition triggered by handle orientation of non-target object.

Authors:  L Vainio; K Tiippana; T Peromaa; C Kuuramo; I Kurki
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-25

2.  Catching and throwing exercises to improve reactive balance: A randomized controlled trial protocol for the comparison of aquatic and dry-land exercise environments.

Authors:  Youngwook Kim; David A E Bolton; Michael N Vakula; Eadric Bressel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.