Literature DB >> 17503025

Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Erik J Schlicht1, Paul R Schrater.   

Abstract

To successfully lift an object, a person's fingers must be moved to locations where forces can be applied that are sufficient for maintaining contact and that allow for easy object manipulation. Obtaining such finger positions becomes more difficult when there is perceptual uncertainty about the location of the hand and object. However, knowledge about the amount of uncertainty could be incorporated into grasp plans to mitigate its effect. For example, during peripheral viewing the fingers could open wider to avoid colliding with or missing the object. The goal of this study is to determine the degree to which people incorporate their understanding of visual uncertainty when making a precision grasp. To investigate, subjects reached to a spatially fixed object whose retinal location was varied by fixating points 0-80 degrees to the left of the object. This manipulation controlled the visual uncertainty of the hand and target without affecting the kinematic demands of the task. We found that people systematically changed their grasping behavior as a function of the amount of visual uncertainty in the task. Specifically, subjects' maximum grip aperture increased linearly with target eccentricity. Moreover, the effect of visual uncertainty on finger trajectories could be captured by a single dimension of change along an axis. Together, these findings suggest that the sensorimotor system estimates visual uncertainty and behaviorally adjusts for it during grasping movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503025     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0970-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.

Authors:  J D Connolly; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense.

Authors:  R J van Beers; A C Sittig; J J Denier van der Gon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Disentangling the role of spatial scale, separation and eccentricity in Weber's law for position.

Authors:  D Whitaker; K Latham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Position and spatial frequency in large-scale localization judgments.

Authors:  C A Burbeck
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Motor control is decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results.

Authors:  Bruce D Keefe; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensorimotor priors are effector dependent.

Authors:  Cong Yin; Huijun Wang; Kunlin Wei; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Simultaneous action execution and observation optimise grasping actions.

Authors:  Mathilde Ménoret; Aurore Curie; Vincent des Portes; Tatjana A Nazir; Yves Paulignan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping objects with environmentally induced position uncertainty.

Authors:  Vassilios N Christopoulos; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.