Literature DB >> 9149760

The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

B E Maki1, W E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Change-in-support strategies, involving stepping or grasping movements of the limbs, are prevalent reactions to instability and appear to play a more important functional role in maintaining upright stance than has generally been appreciated. Contrary to traditional views, change-in-support reactions are not just strategies of last resort, but are often initiated well before the center of mass is near the stability limits of the base of support. Furthermore, it appears that subjects, when given the option, will select these reactions in preference to the fixed-support "hip strategy" that has been purported to be of functional importance. The rapid speed of compensatory change-in-support reactions distinguishes them from "volitional" arm and leg movements. In addition, compensatory stepping reactions often lack the anticipatory control elements that are invariably present in non-compensatory stepping, such as gait initiation. Even when present, these anticipatory adjustments appear to have little functional value during rapid compensatory movements. Lateral destabilization complicates the control of compensatory stepping, a finding that may be particularly relevant to the problem of falls and hip fractures in elderly people. Older adults appear to have problems in controlling lateral stability when stepping to recover balance, even when responding to anteroposterior perturbation. Increased understanding and awareness of change-in-support reactions should lead to development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for detecting and treating specific causes of imbalance and falling in elderly people and in patients with balance impairments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9149760     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/77.5.488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  119 in total

1.  Training rapid stepping responses in an individual with stroke.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Janice Komar; Louis Biasin; Karen Brunton; Bimal Lakhani; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-04-21

2.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Postural stabilization from fingertip contact: I. Variations in sway attenuation, perceived stability and contact forces with aging.

Authors:  François Tremblay; Annie-Claude Mireault; Liam Dessureault; Hélène Manning; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Age-related changes in speed and accuracy during rapid targeted center of pressure movements near the posterior limit of the base of support.

Authors:  Manuel E Hernandez; James A Ashton-Miller; Neil B Alexander
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Regional modulation of the ankle plantarflexor muscles associated with standing external perturbations across different directions.

Authors:  J W Cohen; A Gallina; T D Ivanova; T Vieira; D J McAndrew; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Time to disengage: holding an object influences the execution of rapid compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions for recovery from whole-body instability.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; B Lakhani; S Akram; V Miyasike Da Silva; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.