Literature DB >> 14985902

Initiation of rapid reach-and-grasp balance reactions: is a pre-formed visuospatial map used in controlling the initial arm trajectory?

Mohammad Ghafouri1, William E McIlroy, Brian E Maki.   

Abstract

In order to recover balance by grasping an object for support, the CNS must rapidly move the hand toward a specific target (handhold) in the environment. The early latency (80-140 ms) of these grasping reactions would seem to preclude a role for online visual feedback in the control of the initial limb movement; however, some studies have shown that vision can influence initiation of lower-limb postural reactions at similar latency. This study explored the role of vision in controlling the initial trajectory of grasping reactions triggered by sudden unpredictable medio-lateral platform translation. Healthy young adults were instructed to recover balance by grasping a marked section of a handrail, located to their right. To reinforce a dependence on arm reactions, movement of the feet was prevented by barriers. Liquid-crystal goggles were used to occlude vision during response initiation (200 ms interval starting at perturbation onset, PO). Results showed that the initial grasping trajectory (first 100 ms) and associated muscle activation were heavily modulated to take into account the direction and speed of the perturbation-induced body motion in relation to the handrail. This modulation was unaffected by occlusion of vision at PO, indicating that information about the rail location obtained prior to PO was incorporated into the control. These findings are consistent with the view that the CNS tunes the initial arm trajectory by combining an egocentric spatial map, formed prior to PO, with online feedback about the body motion from non-visual inputs (somatosensory and/or vestibular). This prevents potential delays associated with visual processing and ensures very rapid onset of arm movement that is directed appropriately even though the position of the body is perturbed unpredictably with respect to the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985902     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1855-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Pointing movements may be produced in different frames of reference depending on the task demand.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghafouri; Philippe S Archambault; Sergei V Adamovich; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of lateral destabilization on compensatory stepping responses.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy; S D Perry
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex.

Authors:  C L Colby
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Role of visual and static vestibular influences on dynamic posture control.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; B Guschlbauer; M Bacher
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1986

Review 6.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

7.  Early activation of arm muscles follows external perturbation of upright stance.

Authors:  W E McIlroy; B E Maki
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Two strategies for learning a visually guided motor task.

Authors:  B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1982-12

10.  Role of vestibular information in initiation of rapid postural responses.

Authors:  C F Runge; C L Shupert; F B Horak; F E Zajac
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Where do we look when we walk on stairs? Gaze behaviour on stairs, transitions, and handrails.

Authors:  Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Fran Allard; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  External postural perturbations induce multiple anticipatory postural adjustments when subjects cannot pre-select their stepping foot.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Cognitive demands and cortical control of human balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Stephen W Hill; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Cortical control of postural responses.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Motor and Visuospatial Attention and Motor Planning After Stroke: Considerations for the Rehabilitation of Standing Balance and Gait.

Authors:  Sue Peters; Todd C Handy; Bimal Lakhani; Lara A Boyd; S Jayne Garland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-30

10.  Role of peripheral vision in rapid perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions.

Authors:  Sakineh B Akram; Veronica Miyasike-daSilva; Karen Van Ooteghem; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.