Literature DB >> 23794960

Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy?

James C Gumbart1, Benoît Roux, Christophe Chipot.   

Abstract

Accurate prediction of standard binding free energies describing protein:ligand association remains a daunting computational endeavor. This challenge is rooted to a large extent in the considerable changes in conformational, translational and rotational entropies underlying the binding process that atomistic simulations cannot easily capture. In spite of significant methodological advances, reflected in a continuously improving agreement with experiment, a characterization of alternate strategies aimed at measuring binding affinities, notably their respective advantages and drawbacks, is somewhat lacking. Here, two distinct avenues to determine the standard binding free energy are compared in the case of a short, proline-rich peptide associating to the Src homology domain 3 of tyrosine kinase Abl. These avenues - one relying upon alchemical transformations and the other on potentials of mean force (PMFs) - invoke a series of geometrical restraints acting on collective variables designed to alleviate sampling limitations inherent to classical molecular dynamics simulations. The experimental binding free energy of ΔGbind = -7.99 kcal/mol is well reproduced by the two strategies developed herein, with ΔGbind = -7.7 for the alchemical route and ΔGbind = -7.8 kcal/mol for the alternate PMF-based route. In detailing the underpinnings of these numerical strategies devised for the accurate determination of standard binding free energies, many practical elements of the proposed rigorous, conceptual framework are clarified, thereby paving way to tackle virtually any recognition and association phenomenon.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23794960      PMCID: PMC3685508          DOI: 10.1021/ct3008099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  47 in total

1.  Overcoming free energy barriers using unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jérôme Hénin; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Good practices in free-energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrew Pohorille; Christopher Jarzynski; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Absolute free energy of binding of avidin/biotin, revisited.

Authors:  Ignacio J General; Ralitsa Dragomirova; Hagai Meirovitch
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Thermodynamic stability of water molecules in the bacteriorhodopsin proton channel: a molecular dynamics free energy perturbation study.

Authors:  B Roux; M Nina; R Pomès; J C Smith
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Convergence and error estimation in free energy calculations using the weighted histogram analysis method.

Authors:  Fangqiang Zhu; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 8.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Binding specificity of SH2 domains: insight from free energy simulations.

Authors:  Wenxun Gan; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-03

10.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  82 in total

1.  Resolving the Ligand-Binding Specificity in c-MYC G-Quadruplex DNA: Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations and SPR Experiment.

Authors:  Nanjie Deng; Lauren Wickstrom; Piotr Cieplak; Clement Lin; Danzhou Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Anion-π interactions in complexes of proteins and halogen-containing amino acids.

Authors:  Sunčica Z Borozan; Mario V Zlatović; Srđan Đ Stojanović
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yue Qian; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Jonah Z Vilseck; Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  BFEE: A User-Friendly Graphical Interface Facilitating Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Haohao Fu; James C Gumbart; Haochuan Chen; Xueguang Shao; Wensheng Cai; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions.

Authors:  Jejoong Yoo; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  A Streamlined, General Approach for Computing Ligand Binding Free Energies and Its Application to GPCR-Bound Cholesterol.

Authors:  Reza Salari; Thomas Joseph; Ruchi Lohia; Jérôme Hénin; Grace Brannigan
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Investigation of the Drug Resistance Mechanism of M2-S31N Channel Blockers through Biomolecular Simulations and Viral Passage Experiments.

Authors:  Rami Musharrafieh; Panagiotis Lagarias; Chunlong Ma; Raymond Hau; Alex Romano; George Lambrinidis; Antonios Kolocouris; Jun Wang
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-31

10.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.