Literature DB >> 30358394

A Streamlined, General Approach for Computing Ligand Binding Free Energies and Its Application to GPCR-Bound Cholesterol.

Reza Salari, Thomas Joseph1, Ruchi Lohia, Jérôme Hénin2, Grace Brannigan.   

Abstract

The theory of receptor-ligand binding equilibria has long been well-established in biochemistry, and was primarily constructed to describe dilute aqueous solutions. Accordingly, few computational approaches have been developed for making quantitative predictions of binding probabilities in environments other than dilute isotropic solution. Existing techniques, ranging from simple automated docking procedures to sophisticated thermodynamics-based methods, have been developed with soluble proteins in mind. Biologically and pharmacologically relevant protein-ligand interactions often occur in complex environments, including lamellar phases like membranes and crowded, nondilute solutions. Here, we revisit the theoretical bases of ligand binding equilibria, avoiding overly specific assumptions that are nearly always made when describing receptor-ligand binding. Building on this formalism, we extend the asymptotically exact Alchemical Free Energy Perturbation technique to quantifying occupancies of sites on proteins in a complex bulk, including phase-separated, anisotropic, or nondilute solutions, using a thermodynamically consistent and easily generalized approach that resolves several ambiguities of current frameworks. To incorporate the complex bulk without overcomplicating the overall thermodynamic cycle, we simplify the common approach for ligand restraints by using a single distance-from-bound-configuration (DBC) ligand restraint during AFEP decoupling from protein. DBC restraints should be generalizable to binding modes of most small molecules, even those with strong orientational dependence. We apply this approach to compute the likelihood that membrane cholesterol binds to known crystallographic sites on three GPCRs (β2-adrenergic, 5HT-2B, and μ-opioid) at a range of concentrations. Nonideality of cholesterol in a binary cholesterol:phosphatidylcholine (POPC) bilayer is characterized and consistently incorporated into the interpretation. We find that the three sites exhibit very different affinities for cholesterol: The site on the adrenergic receptor is predicted to be high affinity, with 50% occupancy for 1:109 CHOL:POPC mixtures. The sites on the 5HT-2B and μ-opioid receptor are predicted to be lower affinity, with 50% occupancy for 1:103 CHOL:POPC and 1:102 CHOL:POPC, respectively. These results could not have been predicted from the crystal structures alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30358394      PMCID: PMC6467757          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  46 in total

1.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields.

Authors:  Alexander D MacKerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations.

Authors:  Hyung-June Woo; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Calculating the free energy of association of transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Jinming Zhang; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials.

Authors:  Jiyao Wang; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

7.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Taehoon Kim; Vidyashankara G Iyer; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Free energy calculations applied to membrane proteins.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

10.  Composition dependence of bilayer elasticity.

Authors:  Grace Brannigan; Frank L H Brown
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  14 in total

1.  Characterization of Lipid-Protein Interactions and Lipid-Mediated Modulation of Membrane Protein Function through Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Melanie P Muller; Tao Jiang; Chang Sun; Muyun Lihan; Shashank Pant; Paween Mahinthichaichan; Anda Trifan; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Regulation of membrane protein structure and function by their lipid nano-environment.

Authors:  Ilya Levental; Ed Lyman
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 113.915

4.  Activation of G-protein-coupled receptors is thermodynamically linked to lipid solvation.

Authors:  Alison N Leonard; Edward Lyman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Computational Modeling of Realistic Cell Membranes.

Authors:  Siewert J Marrink; Valentina Corradi; Paulo C T Souza; Helgi I Ingólfsson; D Peter Tieleman; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 6.  The energetics of protein-lipid interactions as viewed by molecular simulations.

Authors:  Robin A Corey; Phillip J Stansfeld; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.919

7.  Cholesterol as a modulator of cannabinoid receptor CB2 signaling.

Authors:  Alexei Yeliseev; Malliga R Iyer; Thomas T Joseph; Nathan J Coffey; Resat Cinar; Lioudmila Zoubak; George Kunos; Klaus Gawrisch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Mechanistic insights into volatile anesthetic modulation of K2P channels.

Authors:  Aboubacar Wague; Thomas T Joseph; Kellie A Woll; Weiming Bu; Kiran A Vaidya; Natarajan V Bhanu; Benjamin A Garcia; Crina M Nimigean; Roderic G Eckenhoff; Paul M Riegelhaupt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Identification and Characterization of Specific Protein-Lipid Interactions Using Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Robin A Corey; Mark S P Sansom; Phillip J Stansfeld
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

10.  Insights into Membrane Protein-Lipid Interactions from Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Robin A Corey; Owen N Vickery; Mark S P Sansom; Phillip J Stansfeld
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.