Literature DB >> 19075242

Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Lianqing Zheng1, Mengen Chen, Wei Yang.   

Abstract

In the past few decades, many ingenious efforts have been made in the development of free-energy simulation methods. Because complex systems often undergo nontrivial structural transition during state switching, achieving efficient free-energy calculation can be challenging. As identified earlier, the "Hamiltonian" lagging, which reveals the fact that necessary structural relaxation falls behind the order parameter move, has been a primary problem for generally low free-energy simulation efficiency. Here, we propose an algorithm by achieving a random walk in both the order parameter space and its generalized force space; thereby, the order parameter move and the required conformational relaxation can be efficiently synchronized. As demonstrated in both the alchemical transition and the conformational transition, a leapfrog improvement in free-energy simulation efficiency can be obtained; for instance, (i) it allows us to solve a notoriously challenging problem: accurately predicting the pK(a) value of a buried titratable residue, Asp-66, in the interior of the V66E staphylococcal nuclease mutant, and (ii) it allows us to gain superior efficiency over the metadynamics algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19075242      PMCID: PMC2629259          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810631106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficient sampling of protein structures by model hopping.

Authors:  Wooseop Kwak; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Optimal estimates of free energies from multistate nonequilibrium work data.

Authors:  Paul Maragakis; Martin Spichty; Martin Karplus
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Assessing the accuracy of metadynamics.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Antonio Rodriguez-Fortea; Francesco Luigi Gervasio; Matteo Ceccarelli; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Synergistic approach to improve "alchemical" free energy calculation in rugged energy surface.

Authors:  Donghong Min; Hongzhi Li; Guohui Li; Ryan Bitetti-Putzer; Wei Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Quantitative computer simulations of biomolecules: a snapshot.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Hugh Nymeyer; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Bernd Berg; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  A hybrid recursion method to robustly ensure convergence efficiencies in the simulated scaling based free energy simulations.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Irina O Carbone; Alexey Lugovskoy; Bernd A Berg; Wei Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  High apparent dielectric constant inside a protein reflects structural reorganization coupled to the ionization of an internal Asp.

Authors:  Daniel A Karp; Apostolos G Gittis; Mary R Stahley; Carolyn A Fitch; Wesley E Stites; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  pKa of residue 66 in Staphylococal nuclease. I. Insights from QM/MM simulations with conventional sampling.

Authors:  Nilanjan Ghosh; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.991

  9 in total
  114 in total

1.  Analysis and elimination of a bias in targeted molecular dynamics simulations of conformational transitions: application to calmodulin.

Authors:  Victor Ovchinnikov; Martin Karplus
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Structural and electrostatic asymmetry at the active site in typical and atypical peroxiredoxin dimers.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury; Ye Yuan; Michael H Knaggs; Leslie B Poole; Jacquelyn S Fetrow
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Sampling protein motion and solvent effect during ligand binding.

Authors:  Vittorio Limongelli; Luciana Marinelli; Sandro Cosconati; Concettina La Motta; Stefania Sartini; Laura Mugnaini; Federico Da Settimo; Ettore Novellino; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Force-momentum-based self-guided Langevin dynamics: a rapid sampling method that approaches the canonical ensemble.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Glycosidic bond conformation preference plays a pivotal role in catalysis of RNA pseudouridylation: a combined simulation and structural study.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Chao Lv; Bo Liang; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang; Hong Li
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Reducing the cost of evaluating the committor by a fitting procedure.

Authors:  Wenjin Li; Ao Ma
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Free energy landscape of a minimalist salt bridge model.

Authors:  Xubin Li; Chao Lv; Karen M Corbett; Lianqing Zheng; Dongsheng Wu; Wei Yang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Advanced Sampling for Molecular Simulation is Coming of Age.

Authors:  Wei Yang
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics and Rao-Blackwell Estimator for Alchemical Free Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Jonah Z Vilseck; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Toward polarizable AMOEBA thermodynamics at fixed charge efficiency using a dual force field approach: application to organic crystals.

Authors:  Ian J Nessler; Jacob M Litman; Michael J Schnieders
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.