Literature DB >> 22109822

Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.

Samantha A Streicher1, Saskia C Sanderson, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Michael Diefenbach, Meg Smirnoff, Inga Peter, Carol R Horowitz, Barbara Brenner, Lynne D Richardson.   

Abstract

In order for DNA biobanks to be a valuable reservoir of genetic information, large numbers of participants from all racial and ethnic backgrounds need to be recruited. This study explored reasons for participating in a new biobank among primarily Hispanic and African American individuals, as well as their general attitudes towards genetic research, and their views on obtaining genetic tests. Focus groups were conducted with Mount Sinai Biobank participants recruited from predominantly lower income, minority communities. The topic guide included questions on The Mount Sinai Biobank, genetic research, and genetic testing. All focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The six focus groups comprised 43 participants: 39 females and four males, aged 27-76 years, with a median household income category of $20,000-$39,999. Twenty-one participants were Hispanic, 20 African American, one Asian, and one White. Participants' reasons for participating in the biobank included altruism, personal and family benefit, and general curiosity. Although there was evidence of conflation between genetic research and genetic testing, most participants held positive views of genetic research and expressed interest in receiving personal genetic test results. Participants wanted to learn more about genetic research and suggested various venues such as health fairs for disseminating information. Participation in biobanks by racial and ethnic minorities is apparently driven by altruism, and desire for personal or collective health benefits. Participants had generally positive attitudes, limited understanding of genetics and genetic research, and made useful suggestions regarding information dissemination mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22109822      PMCID: PMC3186034          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0052-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  20 in total

1.  Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

2.  Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE project.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Jennifer Marshall; Claude Laberge
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

3.  Knowledge about genetics among African Americans.

Authors:  Lisa Kessler; Aliya Collier; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Anuradha Nair; Diane M Austin; Philip F Giampietro
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in association of fasting glucose-associated genomic loci with fasting glucose, HOMA-B, and impaired fasting glucose in the U.S. adult population.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; Tiebin Liu; Peter Shrader; Ajay Yesupriya; Man-huei Chang; Nicole F Dowling; Renée M Ned; Josée Dupuis; Jose C Florez; Muin J Khoury; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Margaret M Brace; Gordon R Bernard; Dan R Masys
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks.

Authors:  Jennifer E Sanner; Lorraine Frazier
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.176

8.  Strong association of socioeconomic status with genetic ancestry in Latinos: implications for admixture studies of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J C Florez; A L Price; D Campbell; L Riba; M V Parra; F Yu; C Duque; R Saxena; N Gallego; M Tello-Ruiz; L Franco; M Rodríguez-Torres; A Villegas; G Bedoya; C A Aguilar-Salinas; M T Tusié-Luna; A Ruiz-Linares; D Reich
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.

Authors:  David Kaufman; Juli Murphy; Joan Scott; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Association analysis in african americans of European-derived type 2 diabetes single nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome association studies.

Authors:  Joshua P Lewis; Nicholette D Palmer; Pamela J Hicks; Michele M Sale; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman; Jasmin Divers; Donald W Bowden
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 9.461

View more
  46 in total

1.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Lori A H Erby; Juli Bollinger; Eva Tetteyfio; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; David Kaufman
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Factors associated with willingness to provide biospecimens for genetics research among African American cancer survivors.

Authors:  Altovise T Ewing; Nnenna Kalu; Gloria Cain; Lori H Erby; Luisel J Ricks-Santi; Eva Tetteyfio-Kidd Telemaque; Denise M Scott
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Inclusion of diverse populations in genomic research and health services: Genomix workshop report.

Authors:  Savio S Mathew; Julian Barwell; Nasaim Khan; Ella Lynch; Michael Parker; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-07-28

5.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  The design and conduct of a community-based registry and biorepository: a focus on cardiometabolic health in Latinos.

Authors:  Gabriel Q Shaibi; Dawn K Coletta; Veronica Vital; Lawrence J Mandarino
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Flora Or; William W Eaton; Nicholas Ialongo
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-20

8.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

Authors:  E M Ngui; T D Warner; L W Roberts
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  A trade secret model for genomic biobanking.

Authors:  John M Conley; Robert Mitchell; R Jean Cadigan; Arlene M Davis; Allison W Dobson; Ryan Q Gladden
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.