Literature DB >> 26898680

Impact of Genomic Counseling on Informed Decision-Making among ostensibly Healthy Individuals Seeking Personal Genome Sequencing: the HealthSeq Project.

Sabrina A Suckiel1,2, Michael D Linderman3,4, Saskia C Sanderson3,4,5, George A Diaz3, Melissa Wasserstein3, Andrew Kasarskis3,4, Eric E Schadt3,4, Randi E Zinberg3.   

Abstract

Personal genome sequencing is increasingly utilized by healthy individuals for predispositional screening and other applications. However, little is known about the impact of 'genomic counseling' on informed decision-making in this context. Our primary aim was to compare measures of participants' informed decision-making before and after genomic counseling in the HealthSeq project, a longitudinal cohort study of individuals receiving personal results from whole genome sequencing (WGS). Our secondary aims were to assess the impact of the counseling on WGS knowledge and concerns, and to explore participants' satisfaction with the counseling. Questionnaires were administered to participants (n = 35) before and after their pre-test genomic counseling appointment. Informed decision-making was measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) and the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SDS). DCS scores decreased after genomic counseling (mean: 11.34 before vs. 5.94 after; z = -4.34, p < 0.001, r = 0.52), and SDS scores increased (mean: 27.91 vs. 29.06 respectively; z = 2.91, p = 0.004, r = 0.35). Satisfaction with counseling was high (mean (SD) = 26.91 (2.68), on a scale where 6 = low and 30 = high satisfaction). HealthSeq participants felt that their decision regarding receiving personal results from WGS was more informed after genomic counseling. Further research comparing the impact of different genomic counseling models is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Genomic counseling; Informed decision-making; Whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26898680     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9935-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Michael D Linderman; Sabrina A Suckiel; George A Diaz; Randi E Zinberg; Kadija Ferryman; Melissa Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Adapting genetic counseling training to the genomic era: more an evolution than a revolution.

Authors:  Catherine Wicklund; Angela Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; J Kroll; N Schmitt; D R Rovner; M L Breer; M L Rothert; G Padonu; G Talarczyk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women's reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening.

Authors:  Annika Ahman; Karin Runestam; Anna Sarkadi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-18

6.  The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; James C Mullikin; Flavia M Facio; Clesson Turner; Praveen F Cherukuri; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Peter S Chines; Pedro Cruz; Nancy F Hansen; Jamie K Teer; Baishali Maskeri; Alice C Young; Teri A Manolio; Alexander F Wilson; Toren Finkel; Paul Hwang; Andrew Arai; Alan T Remaley; Vandana Sachdev; Robert Shamburek; Richard O Cannon; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Bryn D Mars; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers.

Authors:  Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; Amy L McGuire; Stacey Pereira; C Thomas Caskey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  From genetic counseling to "genomic counseling".

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Development and preliminary evaluation of an online educational video about whole-genome sequencing for research participants, patients, and the general public.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Sabrina A Suckiel; Micol Zweig; Erwin P Bottinger; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  9 in total

1.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Roles of attitudes and injunctive norms in decisional conflict and disclosure following receipt of genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Allecia E Reid; Rebecca A Ferrer; Sanjana Kadirvel; Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Primary Care Implementation of Genomic Population Health Screening Using a Large Gene Sequencing Panel.

Authors:  Robert S Wildin; Christine A Giummo; Aaron W Reiter; Thomas C Peterson; Debra G B Leonard
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Genomics Knowledge Scale.

Authors:  Michael D Linderman; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nathan Thompson; David J Weiss; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Michael D Linderman; Sabrina A Suckiel; Randi Zinberg; Melissa Wasserstein; Andrew Kasarskis; George A Diaz; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.

Authors:  Dana Watnick; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Katie M Gallagher; Nehama Teitelman; Katherine E Donohue; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Siobhan M Dolan; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Lora J H Bean; Maren T Scheuner; Michael F Murray; Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green; Kristin G Monaghan; Glenn E Palomaki; Richard R Sharp; Tracy L Trotter; Michael S Watson; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Personal Genome Sequencing in Ostensibly Healthy Individuals and the PeopleSeq Consortium.

Authors:  Michael D Linderman; Daiva E Nielsen; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2016-03-25

9.  Impacts of incorporating personal genome sequencing into graduate genomics education: a longitudinal study over three course years.

Authors:  Michael D Linderman; Saskia C Sanderson; Ali Bashir; George A Diaz; Andrew Kasarskis; Randi Zinberg; Milind Mahajan; Sabrina A Suckiel; Micol Zweig; Eric E Schadt
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.