Literature DB >> 24948529

Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample.

Carla L Storr1, Flora Or, William W Eaton, Nicholas Ialongo.   

Abstract

Opposed to large nationally sponsored health initiatives or biobanks, little is known about gathering genetic samples from young adults participating in academic community-based epidemiologic studies of mental health and substance use, especially samples with a large number of minority participants. This study describes our experience of establishing a genetic arm within a longitudinal study of a cohort of young adults (mean age 29, 75 % African American, 58 % female). In total, 75 % of those interviewed in the most recent wave donated a DNA sample (31.6 % blood and 68.4 % saliva) and over 90 % provided consent for storage and sharing. Current smokers were more likely to donate a sample than nonsmokers (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.14, 2.22). The odds of obtaining a saliva sample were increased for those who were former cannabis smokers and who drank more regularly, but decreased among participants with less education and a history with drug use. Fewer minorities (aOR = 0.37, 95 % CI = 0.18, 0.75; p = 0.006) and cannabis users (aOR = 0.46, 95 % CI = 0.27, 0.77) consented to sharing their sample with other investigators. Findings also illustrate there are many study parameters that are important in planning biologic collection efforts. Building strong rapport and trust with subjects, minimizing the burden involved by the respondent to obtain a biological sample, offering a choice to provide blood or saliva, and offering an incentive will increase the likelihood of obtaining a sample and, importantly, increase the opportunity to store and share the sample for the future.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948529      PMCID: PMC4159479          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-014-0191-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  56 in total

1.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Racial and ethnic disparity in participation in DNA collection at the Atlanta site of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Krista S Crider; Jennita Reefhuis; Alison Woomert; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Collecting saliva samples by mail.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger; A Ronchi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Reasons for participating and genetic information needs among racially and ethnically diverse biobank participants: a focus group study.

Authors:  Samantha A Streicher; Saskia C Sanderson; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Michael Diefenbach; Meg Smirnoff; Inga Peter; Carol R Horowitz; Barbara Brenner; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-06-07

6.  Perceptions about genetic testing for the susceptibility to alcohol dependence and other multifactorial diseases.

Authors:  Vanessa J Marshall; Nnenna Kalu; John Kwagyan; Carla Williams; Robert E Taylor; Denise M Scott
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-12-22

7.  Qualitative assessment of study materials and communication strategies used in studies that include DNA collection.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Erika Reed-Gross; Wanda D Barfield; Christine E Prue; Margaret L Gallagher; Sonja A Rasmussen; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Anuradha Nair; Diane M Austin; Philip F Giampietro
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

Review 9.  Strategies and stakeholders: minority recruitment in cancer genetics research.

Authors:  Rosalina D James; Joon-Ho Yu; Nora B Henrikson; Deborah J Bowen; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-04-14

10.  The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample.

Authors:  Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou; Ward Kay; Roger Pickering
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-07-20       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello; Van Lieou; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A Web-Based Platform for Educating Researchers About Bioethics and Biobanking.

Authors:  Ivana Sehovic; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade; Stephen Sodeke; Rebecca Pentz; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Feasibility of Hair Collection for Cortisol Measurement in Population Research on Adolescent Health.

Authors:  Jodi L Ford; Samantha J Boch; Donna O McCarthy
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 4.  The research participant perspective related to the conduct of genomic cohort studies: A systematic review of the quantitative literature.

Authors:  Deborah Goodman; Deborah Bowen; Lari Wenzel; Paris Tehrani; Francis Fernando; Araksi Khacheryan; Farihah Chowdhury; Catherine O Johnson; Karen Edwards
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Disability inclusion in precision medicine research: a first national survey.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Ying Chen; Yuan Zhang; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Recruitment and Participation of Recreational Runners in a Large Epidemiological and Genetic Research Study: Retrospective Data Analysis.

Authors:  Silvia Manzanero; Maria Kozlovskaia; Nicole Vlahovich; David C Hughes
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-05-23

7.  A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.

Authors:  Nanibaa' A Garrison; Nila A Sathe; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Ingrid A Holm; Saskia C Sanderson; Maureen E Smith; Melissa L McPheeters; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Deborah M Layman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.