Literature DB >> 23793520

Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology.

Y M Kwok1, F G Irani, K H Tay, C C Yang, C G Padre, B S Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare radiation doses in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with those of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) using manufacturers' standard protocols.
METHODS: Dose-levels in head and abdominal imaging were evaluated using a dosimetric phantom. Effective dose estimates were performed by placing thermoluminescent dosimeters in the phantom. Selected protocols for two CBCT systems and comparable protocols for one MDCT system were evaluated. Organ doses were measured and effective doses derived by applying the International Commission on Radiological Protection 2007 tissue weighting factors.
RESULTS: Effective doses estimated for the head protocol were 4.4 and 5.4 mSv for the two CBCT systems respectively and 4.3 mSv for MDCT. Eye doses for one CBCT system and MDCT were comparable (173.6 and 148.4 mGy respectively) but significantly higher compared with the second CBCT (44.6 mGy). Two abdominal protocols were evaluated for each system; the effective doses estimated were 15.0 and 18.6 mSv, 25.4 and 37.0 mSv, and 9.8 and 13.5 mSv, respectively, for each of the CBCT and MDCT systems.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated comparable dose-levels for CBCT and MDCT systems in head studies, but higher dose levels for CBCT in abdominal studies. There was a significant difference in eye doses observed between the CBCT systems. KEY POINTS: • Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly utilised in interventional radiology. • Effective doses for selected CBCT and MDCT protocols were estimated and compared. • Dose levels in CBCT and MDCT were comparable for head studies. • Dose levels were higher in CBCT for abdominal studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793520     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2934-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  16 in total

1.  The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.

Authors:  S D Davis; C K Ross; P N Mobit; L Van der Zwan; W J Chase; K R Shortt
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  ICRP Publication 116. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures.

Authors:  N Petoussi-Henss; W E Bolch; K F Eckerman; A Endo; N Hertel; J Hunt; M Pelliccioni; H Schlattl; M Zankl
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2010 Apr-Oct

3.  Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks; W B Howerton
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

5.  Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization.

Authors:  Rajiv Gupta; Michael Grasruck; Christoph Suess; Soenke H Bartling; Bernhard Schmidt; Karl Stierstorfer; Stefan Popescu; Tom Brady; Thomas Flohr
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Effective dose measured with a life size human phantom in a low Earth orbit mission.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Effective dose: a useful concept in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  David Brenner; Walter Huda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  Absorbed bone marrow dose in certain dental radiographic techniques.

Authors:  S C White; T C Rose
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.

Authors:  J Geleijns; J G Van Unnik; J Zoetelief; D Zweers; J J Broerse
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prototype metal artefact reduction algorithm in flat panel computed tomography - evaluation in patients undergoing transarterial hepatic radioembolisation.

Authors:  Qeumars Mustafa Hamie; Adrian Raoul Kobe; Leif Mietzsch; Michael Manhart; Gilbert Dominique Puippe; Thomas Pfammatter; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Hybrid operating room for the intraoperative CT-guided localization of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Hsin-Yueh Fang; Ko-Wei Chang; Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-01

Review 3.  Imaging Techniques to Aid IR Treatment of Musculoskeletal Malignancy.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Steven Yevich
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  How I do it: Cone-beam CT during transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer.

Authors:  Vania Tacher; Alessandro Radaelli; MingDe Lin; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Devising the guidelines: the techniques of pulmonary nodule localization in uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery-hybrid operating room in the future.

Authors:  Ze-Rui Zhao; Rainbow W H Lau; Peter S Y Yu; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Percutaneous Transthoracic Lung Biopsy: Comparison Between C-Arm Cone-Beam CT and Conventional CT Guidance.

Authors:  Yun-Chung Cheng; Sheng-Heng Tsai; Yuchi Cheng; Jeon-Hor Chen; Jyh-Wen Chai; Clayton Chi-Chang Chen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Radiation Exposure of Patients by Cone Beam CT during Endobronchial Navigation - A Phantom Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt; Rosemarie Banckwitz; Paul Zarogoulidis; Thomas Vogl; Kaid Darwiche; Eugene Goldberg; Haidong Huang; Michael Simoff; Qiang Li; Robert Browning; Lutz Freitag; J Francis Turner; Patrick Le Pivert; Lonny Yarmus; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Johannes Brachmann
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Investigations of organ and effective doses of abdominal cone-beam computed tomography during transarterial chemoembolization using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Shuan Hwang; Hui-Yu Tsai; Yu-Ying Lin; Kar-Wai Lui
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite.

Authors:  Aaron K Jones; Bruno C Odisio
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.