Literature DB >> 14653324

The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.

S D Davis1, C K Ross, P N Mobit, L Van der Zwan, W J Chase, K R Shortt.   

Abstract

The energy response of standard (TLD-100) and high-sensitivity (TLD-100H) LiF thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) has been studied for photon beams with mean energies from about 25 keV to 1100 keV. Canadian primary standards for air kerma were used to establish the air kerma rates for each of the photon beams. TLDs were mounted in a PMMA holder and the air kerma response was measured as a function of energy. The EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used to model the TLD holder and calculate the absorbed dose to the TLD chip per unit air kerma for each beam. The measured and calculated results were combined to obtain the intrinsic dose response of the TLD chip. Broadly, our results are consistent with existing data, which show a marked difference in the energy dependence of the two materials. However, the precision of our measurements (standard uncertainty of about 0.6%) has permitted the identification of features that have not been noted before. In particular, the energy dependence of the two materials is quite different in the important energy region delimited by 137Cs and 60Co gamma rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14653324     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  12 in total

1.  Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Y M Kwok; F G Irani; K H Tay; C C Yang; C G Padre; B S Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Calibration of GafChromic XR-RV3 radiochromic film for skin dose measurement using standardized x-ray spectra and a commercial flatbed scanner.

Authors:  Bradley P McCabe; Michael A Speidel; Tina L Pike; Michael S Van Lysel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Variations in photon energy spectra of a 6 MV beam and their impact on TLD response.

Authors:  Sarah B Scarboro; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effective dose assessment in the maxillofacial region using thermoluminescent (TLD) and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosemeters: a comparative study.

Authors:  J Koivisto; D Schulze; J Wolff; D Rottke
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part I. Electronic brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Regina K Fulkerson; John A Micka; Larry A DeWerd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A concern on in-phantom photon energy response of luminescence dosimeters for clinical applications.

Authors:  A S Pradhan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

7.  TLD assessment of mouse dosimetry during microCT imaging.

Authors:  Said Daibes Figueroa; Christopher T Winkelmann; H William Miller; Wynn A Volkert; Timothy J Hoffman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Contralateral breast dose from partial breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  R Cole Robinson; Christopher L Nelson; Elizabeth S Bloom; Kelly D Kisling; Bryan E Mason; Gary D Fisher; Steven M Kirsner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system.

Authors:  Asa Palm; Elisabeth Nilsson; Lars Herrnsdorf
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction for solid-state detectors and phantom scatter correction at 137Cs energy.

Authors:  T Palani Selvam; Subhalaxmi Mishra; R S Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.