Literature DB >> 8173877

Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.

J Geleijns1, J G Van Unnik, J Zoetelief, D Zweers, J J Broerse.   

Abstract

Radiation exposure of the patient during routine computed tomography (CT) examinations is known to be relatively high. In this study organ doses were determined using two methods and these served as a basis to calculate the effective dose. Thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLDs) were used to measure organ doses in an anthropomorphic Rando Alderson phantom. In addition organ doses were obtained from measurement of the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) and the application of published organ dose conversion factors. Effective dose values obtained with the Rando phantom for CT head examinations are about 1-2 mSv. For CT examinations of thorax and abdomen the estimation of effective doses with the Rando phantom yielded values of 18 and 24 mSv respectively. Effective doses determined from CTDI values were similar for CT head examinations (1-2 mSv) but were smaller for the CT thorax scan (11-15 mSv) and the CT abdomen scan (15-20 mSv). In this study effective dose values are relatively high compared with the results of other investigators who indicate effective doses and effective dose equivalents of 7-9 mSv for CT of the thorax and of 4-16 mSv for CT of the abdomen. Discrepancies between our results and those from other studies could be attributed to differences in the selected CT protocols and to differences in the phantoms employed. Measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom were laborious and time-consuming. Assessment of organ doses from CTDI values and organ dose conversion factors will therefore be the preferable method for future dose intercomparisons at different locations in The Netherlands. It should be realized, however, that this method tends to yield up to 40% lower effective dose values compared with the assessment of effective dose with a Rando phantom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8173877     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-796-360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Quantification of radiation dose savings in cardiac computed tomography using prospectively triggered mode and ECG pulsing: a phantom study.

Authors:  Lukas Lehmkuhl; Dieter Gosch; H D Nagel; Patrick Stumpp; Thomas Kahn; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.

Authors:  Boris Nikolic; Faisal Khosa; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Atif N Khan; Sheryar Sarwar; Chun-Shan Yam; Laurence E Court; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Effective dose estimates for cone beam computed tomography in interventional radiology.

Authors:  Y M Kwok; F G Irani; K H Tay; C C Yang; C G Padre; B S Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose to the lens using different temporal bone CT scanning protocols.

Authors:  Y Niu; Z Wang; Y Liu; Z Liu; V Yao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning.

Authors:  K D Hopper; J D Neuman; S H King; A R Kunselman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Fast Monte Carlo simulation on a voxelized human phantom deformed to a patient.

Authors:  G Bueno; O Déniz; C B Carrascosa; J M Delgado; L Brualla
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and physiology: first experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in a rubidium 82 PET-CT protocol.

Authors:  Mehrbod Javadi; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gerald McBride; Corina Voicu; William Epley; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Assessment of Radiation Dose Delivered and Volume Measurement By Low- and High-Dose Diagnostic Computed Tomography: Anthropomorphic Liver Phantom Study.

Authors:  Subhash Chand Kheruka; Manish Ora; Shivani Chaudhary; Sanjay Gambhir
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-10-21

9.  A survey of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures.

Authors:  Ernest K Osei; Johnson Darko
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2012-09-06

10.  Estimation of patient organ doses from CT examinations in Tanzania.

Authors:  Justin E Ngaile; Peter K Msaki
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.