Literature DB >> 23785131

Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

A M E Sarwary1, L P J Selen, W P Medendorp.   

Abstract

In everyday life, we seamlessly adapt our movements and consolidate them to multiple behavioral contexts. This natural flexibility seems to be contingent on the presence of movement-related sensorimotor cues and cannot be reproduced when static visual or haptic cues are given to signify different behavioral contexts. So far, only sensorimotor cues that dissociate the sensorimotor plans prior to force field exposure have been successful in learning two opposing perturbations. Here we show that vestibular cues, which are only available during the perturbation, improve the formation and recall of multiple control strategies. We exposed subjects to inertial forces by accelerating them laterally on a vestibular platform. The coupling between reaching movement (forward-backward) and acceleration direction (leftward-rightward) switched every 160 trials, resulting in two opposite force environments. When exposed for a second time to the same environment, with the opposite environment in between, subjects showed retention resulting in an ∼3 times faster adaptation rate compared with the first exposure. Our results suggest that vestibular cues provide contextual information throughout the reach, which is used to facilitate independent learning and recall of multiple motor memories. Vestibular cues provide feedback about the underlying cause of reach errors, thereby disambiguating the various task environments and reducing interference of motor memories.

Keywords:  contextual cues; interference; internal models; motor adaptation; savings; vestibular system

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23785131      PMCID: PMC3763157          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00914.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Central representation of time during motor learning.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference.

Authors:  R Christopher Miall; Ned Jenkinson; Kunal Kulkarni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; Satomi Hirai; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Motor learning by field approximation.

Authors:  F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi; E Bizzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm.

Authors:  P Dizio; J R Lackner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Generalization and transfer of contextual cues in motor learning.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; D F Stegeman; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice.

Authors:  Romy S Bakker; Roel H A Weijer; Robert J van Beers; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Pavan A Vaswani; Mollie K Marko; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Stability of Phase Relationships While Coordinating Arm Reaches with Whole Body Motion.

Authors:  Romy S Bakker; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tagging motor memories with transcranial direct current stimulation allows later artificially-controlled retrieval.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Atsushi Yokoi; Takahiro Kimura; Masaya Hirashima; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Single versus dual-rate learning when exposed to Coriolis forces during reaching movements.

Authors:  Judith L Rudolph; Janny C Stapel; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  NCS Assessments of the Motor, Sensory, and Physical Health Domains.

Authors:  Jane E Clark; Russell Pate; Rose Marie Rine; Jennifer Christy; Pamela Dalton; Diane L Damiano; Stephen Daniels; Jonathan M Holmes; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Susan Magasi; Ryan McCreery; Kerry McIver; Karl M Newell; Terence Sanger; David Sugden; Elsie Taveras; Steven Hirschfeld
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhou; Elizabeth A Kruse; Rylee Brower; Ryan North; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.974

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.