Literature DB >> 25123484

A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning.

David J Herzfeld1, Pavan A Vaswani2, Mollie K Marko3, Reza Shadmehr3.   

Abstract

The current view of motor learning suggests that when we revisit a task, the brain recalls the motor commands it previously learned. In this view, motor memory is a memory of motor commands, acquired through trial-and-error and reinforcement. Here we show that the brain controls how much it is willing to learn from the current error through a principled mechanism that depends on the history of past errors. This suggests that the brain stores a previously unknown form of memory, a memory of errors. A mathematical formulation of this idea provides insights into a host of puzzling experimental data, including savings and meta-learning, demonstrating that when we are better at a motor task, it is partly because the brain recognizes the errors it experienced before.
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123484      PMCID: PMC4506639          DOI: 10.1126/science.1253138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  33 in total

1.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Gregory D Weston; Johnny Liang; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation through interaction between posterior parietal and motor cortical areas.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Savings in locomotor adaptation explained by changes in learning parameters following initial adaptation.

Authors:  Firas Mawase; Lior Shmuelof; Simona Bar-Haim; Amir Karniel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey.

Authors:  Farrel R Robinson; Christopher T Noto; Scott E Bevans
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Subthreshold activation of the superior colliculus drives saccade motor learning.

Authors:  Robijanto Soetedjo; Albert F Fuchs; Yoshiko Kojima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory.

Authors:  Jeong-Yoon Lee; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motor task variation induces structural learning.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  How does our motor system determine its learning rate?

Authors:  Robert J van Beers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  104 in total

1.  Generalization and transfer of contextual cues in motor learning.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; D F Stegeman; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Reza Shadmehr; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yuichiro Shirota; Takahiro Shimizu; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Yasuo Terao; Shoji Tsuji; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Motoaki Uchimura; Masato Inoue; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback.

Authors:  J Ryan Morehead; Jordan A Taylor; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Robust retention of individual sensorimotor skill after self-guided practice.

Authors:  Se-Woong Park; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Motor adaptation and generalization of reaching movements using motor primitives based on spatial coordinates.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The 24-h savings of adaptation to novel movement dynamics initially reflects the recall of previous performance.

Authors:  Katrina P Nguyen; Weiwei Zhou; Erin McKenna; Katrina Colucci-Chang; Laurence C Jayet Bray; Eghbal A Hosseini; Laith Alhussein; Meena Rezazad; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Both fast and slow learning processes contribute to savings following sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Susan K Coltman; Joshua G A Cashaback; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Independent voluntary correction and savings in locomotor learning.

Authors:  Kristan A Leech; Ryan T Roemmich
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.