Literature DB >> 9705449

Gravitoinertial force background level affects adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements.

J R Lackner1, P Dizio.   

Abstract

We evaluated the combined effects on reaching movements of the transient, movement-dependent Coriolis forces and the static centrifugal forces generated in a rotating environment. Specifically, we assessed the effects of comparable Coriolis force perturbations in different static force backgrounds. Two groups of subjects made reaching movements toward a just-extinguished visual target before rotation began, during 10 rpm counterclockwise rotation, and after rotation ceased. One group was seated on the axis of rotation, the other 2.23 m away. The resultant of gravity and centrifugal force on the hand was 1.0 g for the on-center group during 10 rpm rotation, and 1.031 g for the off-center group because of the 0.25 g centrifugal force present. For both groups, rightward Coriolis forces, approximately 0.2 g peak, were generated during voluntary arm movements. The endpoints and paths of the initial per-rotation movements were deviated rightward for both groups by comparable amounts. Within 10 subsequent reaches, the on-center group regained baseline accuracy and straight-line paths; however, even after 40 movements the off-center group had not resumed baseline endpoint accuracy. Mirror-image aftereffects occurred when rotation stopped. These findings demonstrate that manual control is disrupted by transient Coriolis force perturbations and that adaptation can occur even in the absence of visual feedback. An increase, even a small one, in background force level above normal gravity does not affect the size of the reaching errors induced by Coriolis forces nor does it affect the rate of reacquiring straight reaching paths; however, it does hinder restoration of reaching accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9705449     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field.

Authors:  J-M Prieur; C Bourdin; J-L Vercher; F Sarès; J Blouin; G M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics.

Authors:  Hugo Bruggeman; Herbert L Pick; John J Rieser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Postural control at the human wrist.

Authors:  John Z Z Chew; Simon C Gandevia; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Vestibular benefits to task savings in motor adaptation.

Authors:  A M E Sarwary; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading.

Authors:  Noor Al-Zanoon; Michael Dambacher; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-07-11

7.  Vestibular contribution to the planning of reach trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher J Bockisch; Thomas Haslwanter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Similarities in the neural control of the shoulder and elbow joints belie their structural differences.

Authors:  Andrew R Karduna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.