Literature DB >> 14608451

Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference.

R Christopher Miall1, Ned Jenkinson, Kunal Kulkarni.   

Abstract

We have tested human visuo-motor adaptation in rotated-feedback tasks in which subjects first learn to move a cursor to visual targets with a rotational perturbation between joystick and cursor, and are then challenged with the opposing rotation. We then retest the subjects in the original adaptation task, to measure retention of a short-term memory of its earlier learning. Others have used similar tasks and report retrograde interference between one task and the short-term motor memory of the preceding task, such that later performance is impaired. However, we show that in the short-term conditions tested here, these effects can be considered as anterograde interference effects between the two tasks and we find no evidence of retrograde interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608451     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1630-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Variable practice with lenses improves visuo-motor plasticity.

Authors:  C A Roller; H S Cohen; K T Kimball; J J Bloomberg
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-10

6.  Mechanisms for sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input.

Authors:  S Abeele; O Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Daniel B Willingham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets.

Authors:  O Bock; K Arnold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The REM sleep-memory consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  J M Siegel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  65 in total

1.  Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Graham Caithness; Rieko Osu; Paul Bays; Henry Chase; Jessica Klassen; Mitsuo Kawato; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control.

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer; Pietro Mazzoni
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptation of grasping responses to distorted object size and orientation.

Authors:  Cornelia Weigelt; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Explicit contextual information selectively contributes to predictive switching of internal models.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Norikazu Sugimoto; Rieko Osu; Kiyoka Tsutsui; Kouichi Sugiyama; Yasuhiro Wada; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Laura Walk; Daniel G Woolley; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interference during the implicit learning of two different motor sequences.

Authors:  Marianne A Stephan; Beat Meier; Ariane Orosz; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig; Alain Kaelin-Lang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Statistics of natural movements are reflected in motor errors.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.