Literature DB >> 23709063

Visual nesting of stimuli affects rhesus monkeys' (Macaca mulatta) quantity judgments in a bisection task.

Michael J Beran1, Audrey E Parrish.   

Abstract

Nonhuman animals are highly proficient at judging relative quantities presented in a variety of formats, including visual, auditory, and even cross-modal formats. Performance typically is constrained by the ratio between sets, as would be expected under Weber's law and as is described in the approximate number system (ANS) hypothesis. In most cases, tests are designed to avoid any perceptual confusion for animals regarding the stimulus sets, but despite this, animals show some of the perceptual biases that humans show based on organization of stimuli. Here, we demonstrate an additional perceptual bias that emerges from the illusion of nested sets. When arrays of circles were presented on a computer screen and were to be classified as larger than or smaller than an established central value, rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) underestimated quantities when circles were nested within each other. This matched a previous report with adult humans (Chesney & Gelman, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 24:1104-1113, 2012), indicating that macaques, like humans, show the pattern of biased perception predicted by ANS estimation. Although some macaques overcame this perceptual bias, demonstrating that they could come to view nested stimuli as individual elements to be included in the estimates of quantity used for classifying arrays, the majority of the monkeys showed the bias of underestimating nested arrays throughout the experiment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709063      PMCID: PMC3735653          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0474-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  52 in total

1.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers.

Authors:  S Cordes; R Gelman; C R Gallistel; J Whalen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

3.  Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: randomness vs regularity.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

4.  Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

5.  Visual nesting impacts approximate number system estimation.

Authors:  Dana L Chesney; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Salamanders ( Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian.

Authors:  Claudia Uller; Robert Jaeger; Gena Guidry; Carolyn Martin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Nonverbal estimation during numerosity judgements by adult humans.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Lauren A Taglialatela; Timothy M Flemming; Frances M James; David A Washburn
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Relative quantity judgment by Asian elephants (Elephas maximus).

Authors:  Naoko Irie-Sugimoto; Tessei Kobayashi; Takao Sato; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement.

Authors:  Justin Halberda; Michèle M M Mazzocco; Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Simone Gori; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Brielle T James; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Authors:  Devina Wadhera; Lynn M Wilkie; Elizabeth D Capaldi-Phillips
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Sara E Futch; Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive the Zöllner illusion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Illusory patterns are fishy for fish, too.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Marco Dadda
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.492

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.