Literature DB >> 28182487

Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Audrey E Parrish1, Brielle T James2, Michael J Beran3.   

Abstract

The density bias, documented within the foraging domain for some monkey species and for human infants, emerges when perceived numerosity is affected by interstimulus distance such that densely arranged food items appear more numerous relative to the same amount of food sparsely arranged. In this study, capuchin monkeys and rhesus monkeys were presented with a computerized relative discrimination task that allowed for the control of stimulus size, interelemental distance, and overall array pattern. The main objective was to determine whether the density bias was a more widespread and general perceptual phenomenon that extends beyond the foraging domain, similar to other numerosity illusions and biases. Furthermore, we compared the current results to these same monkeys' data from a previous study on the Solitaire numerosity illusion to investigate a potential link between a density bias and this related numerical illusion. Capuchin monkeys showed a density bias in their perceptual discrimination of dense versus sparse stimuli; however, rhesus monkeys perceived this bias to a lesser degree. Individual differences were evident, as with the Solitaire illusion. However, there was not a relation between susceptibility to a density bias and susceptibility to the Solitaire illusion within these same monkeys. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28182487      PMCID: PMC5319710          DOI: 10.1037/com0000058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  29 in total

1.  The NASA/LRC Computerized Test System.

Authors:  W K Richardson; D A Washburn; W D Hopkins; E S Savage-Rumbaugh; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1990

2.  Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: randomness vs regularity.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

3.  Visual nesting impacts approximate number system estimation.

Authors:  Dana L Chesney; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Attenuation and reacquisition of foraging behavior in a patchy environment.

Authors:  K G Mitchell; J L Calton; R C Threlkeld; T R Schachtman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  J Fagot; C Deruelle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perceived numerosity: a comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

7.  Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  William D Hopkins; David A Washburn
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Jeffrey R Stevens; Justin N Wood; Marc D Hauser
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Giovanna Spinozzi; Carlo De Lillo; Valentina Truppa
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 10.  Beyond the number domain.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Michael L Platt; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  1 in total

1.  The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Authors:  Devina Wadhera; Lynn M Wilkie; Elizabeth D Capaldi-Phillips
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.