Literature DB >> 25812828

Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

Christian Agrillo1, Simone Gori, Michael J Beran.   

Abstract

During the last decade, visual illusions have been used repeatedly to understand similarities and differences in visual perception of human and non-human animals. However, nearly all studies have focused only on illusions not related to motion perception, and to date, it is unknown whether non-human primates perceive any kind of motion illusion. In the present study, we investigated whether rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceived one of the most popular motion illusions in humans, the Rotating Snake illusion (RSI). To this purpose, we set up four experiments. In Experiment 1, subjects initially were trained to discriminate static versus dynamic arrays. Once reaching the learning criterion, they underwent probe trials in which we presented the RSI and a control stimulus identical in overall configuration with the exception that the order of the luminance sequence was changed in a way that no apparent motion is perceived by humans. The overall performance of monkeys indicated that they spontaneously classified RSI as a dynamic array. Subsequently, we tested adult humans in the same task with the aim of directly comparing the performance of human and non-human primates (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, we found that monkeys can be successfully trained to discriminate between the RSI and a control stimulus. Experiment 4 showed that a simple change in luminance sequence in the two arrays could not explain the performance reported in Experiment 3. These results suggest that some rhesus monkeys display a human-like perception of this motion illusion, raising the possibility that the neurocognitive systems underlying motion perception may be similar between human and non-human primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25812828      PMCID: PMC4464988          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-015-0860-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  47 in total

1.  Perceptual dimorphism in visual motion from stationary patterns.

Authors:  G Naor-Raz; R Sekuler
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  R Desimone; C G Gross
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The neural basis of the Enigma illusion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Manuela Ruzzoli; Simone Gori; Andrea Pavan; Cornelia Pirulli; Carlo A Marzi; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display.

Authors:  Ikuya Murakami; Akiyoshi Kitaoka; Hiroshi Ashida
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A new motion illusion based on competition between two kinds of motion processing units: the accordion grating.

Authors:  Simone Gori; Enrico Giora; Arash Yazdanbakhsh; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2011-07-02

6.  Functional brain imaging of the Rotating Snakes illusion by fMRI.

Authors:  Ichiro Kuriki; Hiroshi Ashida; Ikuya Murakami; Akiyoshi Kitaoka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive the Zöllner illusion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Decreased coherent motion discrimination in autism spectrum disorder: the role of attentional zoom-out deficit.

Authors:  Luca Ronconi; Simone Gori; Milena Ruffino; Sandro Franceschini; Barbara Urbani; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do fish perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Simone Gori; Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  9 in total

1.  Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans.

Authors:  Margarida Agrochao; Ryosuke Tanaka; Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Visual Illusions: An Interesting Tool to Investigate Developmental Dyslexia and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Simone Gori; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  How Illusory Is the Solitaire Illusion? Assessing the Degree of Misperception of Numerosity in Adult Humans.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-27

4.  Motion Illusions as Environmental Enrichment for Zoo Animals: A Preliminary Investigation on Lions (Panthera leo).

Authors:  Barbara Regaiolli; Angelo Rizzo; Giorgio Ottolini; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Caterina Spiezio; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04

5.  Do Domestic Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?

Authors:  Miina Lõoke; Lieta Marinelli; Carla Jade Eatherington; Christian Agrillo; Paolo Mongillo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  From Receptive to Perceptive Fields: Size-Dependent Asymmetries in Both Negative Afterimages and Subcortical On and Off Post-Stimulus Responses.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Hui Li; Ye Wang; Tianhao Lei; Jijun Wang; Lothar Spillmann; Ian Max Andolina; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Truth is in the eye of the beholder: Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in dogs.

Authors:  Benjamin Keep; Helen E Zulch; Anna Wilkinson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Motion illusion-like patterns extracted from photo and art images using predictive deep neural networks.

Authors:  Taisuke Kobayashi; Akiyoshi Kitaoka; Manabu Kosaka; Kenta Tanaka; Eiji Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.