Literature DB >> 24408656

Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive the Zöllner illusion?

Christian Agrillo1, Audrey E Parrish, Michael J Beran.   

Abstract

A long-standing debate surrounds the issue of whether human and nonhuman animals share the same perceptual mechanisms. In humans, the Zöllner illusion occurs when two parallel lines appear to be convergent when oblique crosshatching lines are superimposed. Although one baboon study suggests that they too might perceive this illusion, the results of that study were unclear, whereas two recent studies suggest that birds see this illusion in the opposite direction from humans. It is currently unclear whether these mixed results are an artifact of the experimental design or reflect a peculiarity of birds' visual system or, instead, a wider phenomenon shared among nonhuman mammals. Here, we trained 6 monkeys to select the narrower of two gaps at the end of two convergent lines. Three different conditions were set up: control (no crosshatches), perpendicular (crosshatches not inducing the illusion), and Zöllner (crosshatches inducing the illusion in humans). During training, the degrees of convergence between the two lines ranged from 15° to 12°. Monkeys that reached the training criterion were tested with more difficult discriminations (11°-1°), including probe trials with parallel lines (0°). The results showed that monkeys perceived the Zöllner illusion in the same direction as humans. Comparison of these data with the data from bird studies points toward the existence of different orientation-tuned mechanisms between primate and nonprimate species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24408656     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0573-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  The NASA/LRC Computerized Test System.

Authors:  W K Richardson; D A Washburn; W D Hopkins; E S Savage-Rumbaugh; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1990

2.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  R Desimone; C G Gross
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Perception of brightness and brightness illusions in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Sean P MacEvoy; Michael A Paradiso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The roles of inducer size and distance in the Ebbinghaus illusion (Titchener circles).

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Mike G Harris; Tim A Yates
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque.

Authors:  D Boussaoud; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1991-04-22       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Shape from shading in pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri; Art Kieres; Nicholas Commons-Miller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-06-29

7.  Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion.

Authors:  Noriyuki Nakamura; Sota Watanabe; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-07

8.  Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion.

Authors:  Sota Watanabe; Noriyuki Nakamura; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  A labeled-line code for small and large numerosities in the monkey prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder; Katharina Merten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cats see subjective contours.

Authors:  M Bravo; R Blake; S Morrison
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  8 in total

1.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Simone Gori; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  Forest before the trees in the aquatic world: global and local processing in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Marco Dadda; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  How Illusory Is the Solitaire Illusion? Assessing the Degree of Misperception of Numerosity in Adult Humans.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-27

7.  Do Domestic Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) Perceive Numerosity Illusions?

Authors:  Miina Lõoke; Lieta Marinelli; Carla Jade Eatherington; Christian Agrillo; Paolo Mongillo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.