Literature DB >> 23652856

How reliable are pseudocontact shifts induced in proteins and ligands by mobile paramagnetic metal tags? A modelling study.

Dmitry Shishmarev1, Gottfried Otting.   

Abstract

The anisotropic component of the magnetic susceptibility tensor (Δχ tensor) associated with various paramagnetic metal ions can induce pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) in proteins, yielding valuable restraints in structural studies. In particular, PCSs have successfully been used to study ligands that bind to proteins tagged with a paramagnetic metal ion, which is of great interest in fragment-based drug design. To create easy-to-interpret PCSs, the metal ion must be attached to the protein in a rigid manner. Most of the existing methods for site-specific attachment of a metal tag, however, result in tethers with residual flexibility. Here we present model calculations to quantify the extent, to which mobility of the metal-binding tag can compromise the quality of the Δχ tensor that can be determined from the PCSs observed in the protein. Assuming that the protein can be approximated by a sphere and the tag is attached by a single tether, the results show that a single effective ∆χ tensor can describe the PCSs and RDCs of the protein spins very well even in the presence of substantial tag mobility, implying that PCSs of ligands in binding pockets of the protein can be predicted with similar accuracy. In contrast, the quality of the PCS prediction for nuclear spins positioned above the surface of the protein is significantly poorer, with implications for studies of protein-protein complexes. The simulations probed the sensitivity of the effective Δχ tensor to different parameters, including length of the tether between protein and metal ion, protein size, type and amplitude of tag motion, tensor orientation relative to the protein and direction of tag motion. Tether length and amplitude of motion were identified as two key parameters. It is shown that the amplitude of tag motions cannot be quantified by simple comparisons of the effective Δχ tensor with the alignment tensor determined from RDCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23652856     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-013-9738-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  49 in total

Review 1.  Paramagnetic tagging of diamagnetic proteins for solution NMR.

Authors:  Fernando Rodriguez-Castañeda; Peter Haberz; Andrei Leonov; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Site-specific labelling of proteins with a rigid lanthanide-binding tag.

Authors:  Xun-Cheng Su; Thomas Huber; Nicholas E Dixon; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  PARAssign--paramagnetic NMR assignments of protein nuclei on the basis of pseudocontact shifts.

Authors:  Simon P Skinner; Mois Moshev; Mathias A S Hass; Peter H J Keizers; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Convenient synthesis of multifunctional EDTA-based chiral metal chelates substituted with an S-mesylcysteine.

Authors:  Andrei Leonov; Brigitte Voigt; Fernando Rodriguez-Castañeda; Peyman Sakhaii; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  An NMR strategy for fragment-based ligand screening utilizing a paramagnetic lanthanide probe.

Authors:  Tomohide Saio; Kenji Ogura; Kazumi Shimizu; Masashi Yokochi; Terrence R Burke; Fuyuhiko Inagaki
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Lanthanide tags for site-specific ligation to an unnatural amino acid and generation of pseudocontact shifts in proteins.

Authors:  Choy Theng Loh; Kiyoshi Ozawa; Kellie L Tuck; Nicholas Barlow; Thomas Huber; Gottfried Otting; Bim Graham
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.774

7.  4,4'-dithiobisdipicolinic acid: a small and convenient lanthanide binding tag for protein NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xinying Jia; Ansis Maleckis; Thomas Huber; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 8.  Expanding the utility of NMR restraints with paramagnetic compounds: background and practical aspects.

Authors:  Julia Koehler; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 9.795

9.  Site-specific labeling of proteins with a chemically stable, high-affinity tag for protein study.

Authors:  Yin Yang; Qing-Feng Li; Chan Cao; Feng Huang; Xun-Cheng Su
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.236

10.  Novel techniques for weak alignment of proteins in solution using chemical tags coordinating lanthanide ions.

Authors:  Takahisa Ikegami; Laurent Verdier; Peyman Sakhaii; Susanne Grimme; Barbara Pescatore; Krishna Saxena; Klaus M Fiebig; Christian Griesinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Paramagnetic NMR probes for characterization of the dynamic conformations and interactions of oligosaccharides.

Authors:  Koichi Kato; Takumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.916

2.  A minor conformation of a lanthanide tag on adenylate kinase characterized by paramagnetic relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mathias A S Hass; Wei-Min Liu; Roman V Agafonov; Renee Otten; Lien A Phung; Jesika T Schilder; Dorothee Kern; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Structure restraints from heteronuclear pseudocontact shifts generated by lanthanide tags at two different sites.

Authors:  Benjamin J G Pearce; Shereen Jabar; Choy-Theng Loh; Monika Szabo; Bim Graham; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Conformationally locked lanthanide chelating tags for convenient pseudocontact shift protein nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Daniel Joss; Roché M Walliser; Kaspar Zimmermann; Daniel Häussinger
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Lanthanoid tagging via an unnatural amino acid for protein structure characterization.

Authors:  Wen-Xue Jiang; Xin-Hua Gu; Xu Dong; Chun Tang
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 6.  Characterizing conformational ensembles of multi-domain proteins using anisotropic paramagnetic NMR restraints.

Authors:  Xue-Ni Hou; Hidehito Tochio
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 7.  Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Christoph Nitsche; Henry Orton; Mark Overhand; Gottfried Otting; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 72.087

8.  Site-specific tagging proteins with a rigid, small and stable transition metal chelator, 8-hydroxyquinoline, for paramagnetic NMR analysis.

Authors:  Yin Yang; Feng Huang; Thomas Huber; Xun-Cheng Su
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Pulse EPR-enabled interpretation of scarce pseudocontact shifts induced by lanthanide binding tags.

Authors:  Elwy H Abdelkader; Xuejun Yao; Akiva Feintuch; Luke A Adams; Luigi Aurelio; Bim Graham; Daniella Goldfarb; Gottfried Otting
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Dynamic binding mode of a Synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex in solution.

Authors:  Kyle D Brewer; Taulant Bacaj; Andrea Cavalli; Carlo Camilloni; James D Swarbrick; Jin Liu; Amy Zhou; Peng Zhou; Nicholas Barlow; Junjie Xu; Alpay B Seven; Eric A Prinslow; Rashmi Voleti; Daniel Häussinger; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Diana R Tomchick; Michele Vendruscolo; Bim Graham; Thomas C Südhof; Josep Rizo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.