Literature DB >> 23643905

Measuring contrast sensitivity.

Denis G Pelli1, Peter Bex.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity defines the threshold between the visible and invisible, which has obvious significance for basic and clinical vision science. Fechner's 1860 review reported that threshold contrast is 1% for a remarkably wide range of targets and conditions. While printed charts are still in use, computer testing is becoming more popular because it offers efficient adaptive measurement of threshold for a wide range of stimuli. Both basic and clinical studies usually want to know fundamental visual capability, regardless of the observer's subjective criterion. Criterion effects are minimized by the use of an objective task: multiple-alternative forced-choice detection or identification. Having many alternatives reduces the guessing rate, which makes each trial more informative, so fewer trials are needed. Finally, populations who may experience crowding or target confusion should be tested with one target at a time.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive threshold estimation; Contrast sensitivity; Fechner; QUEST; Threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643905      PMCID: PMC3744596          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  49 in total

1.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Walter Makous
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Studies of psychophysical methods for measuring visual thresholds.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1952-09

3.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.

Authors:  Andrew B Watson; Albert J Ahumada
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  R C Kleiner; C Enger; M F Alexander; S L Fine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-01

5.  Abnormal neurological signs, visual contrast sensitivity, and the deficit syndrome of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Csongor Cimmer; István Szendi; Gábor Csifcsák; György Szekeres; Zoltán Ambrus Kovács; István Somogyi; György Benedek; Zoltán Janka; Szabolcs Kéri
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population.

Authors:  B Brown; J E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 7.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures.

Authors:  B Treutwein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and the discrimination of Snellen letters in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Regan; J Raymond; A P Ginsburg; T J Murray
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing.

Authors:  B L Halliday
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 10.  The effect of glaucoma on central visual function.

Authors:  R L Stamper
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1984
View more
  64 in total

1.  The effects of simulated acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments on detection of pedestrian hazards in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Garrett Swan; Maha Shahin; Jacqueline Albert; Joseph Herrmann; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2019-07

2.  Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of reliability, test-retest repeatability and sample size using the Metropsis software.

Authors:  Thiago Paiva Fernandes; Natalia Leandro de Almeida; Pamela D Butler; Natanael Antonio Santos
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Nicotine gum enhances visual processing in healthy nonsmokers.

Authors:  Thiago P Fernandes; Natalia L Almeida; Gabriella M Silva; Natanael A Santos
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Authors:  Shuang Song; Dennis M Levi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Assessing the detailed time course of perceptual sensitivity change in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Yukai Zhao; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Simulating visibility under reduced acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  William B Thompson; Gordon E Legge; Daniel J Kersten; Robert A Shakespeare; Quan Lei
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 8.  The Assessment of Visual Function and Functional Vision.

Authors:  Christopher R Bennett; Peter J Bex; Corinna M Bauer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; N Jeremy Hill; Melis S Tuzun; Nazia M Alam; Jason B Carmel; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Adaptable history biases in human perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Arman Abrahamyan; Laura Luz Silva; Steven C Dakin; Matteo Carandini; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.