Literature DB >> 3337707

Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration.

R C Kleiner1, C Enger, M F Alexander, S L Fine.   

Abstract

Low-contrast charts were used to investigate the possibility that patients with drusen have visual deficits not detected by standard Snellen charts. We compared performance on Regan letter charts between 52 eyes with drusen and Snellen acuity of 20/20 and 27 control eyes. The drusen group read fewer letters than the control group on all of the charts tested. This difference increased as the contrast of the charts decreased. The loss of performance on all of the Regan charts correlated with drusen severity. Twenty-one eyes with drusen and normal Snellen acuity also were tested with a Ginsburg contrast sensitivity chart and compared with age-matched normal controls. The results showed a loss of contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies and a loss of peak contrast sensitivity with increasing drusen severity. These results suggest that in patients with drusen, low-contrast charts may be useful for measuring visual loss not detected by standard Snellen charts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3337707     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130061028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  35 in total

1.  Is cataract surgery justified in patients with age related macular degeneration? A visual function and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  A M Armbrecht; C Findlay; S Kaushal; P Aspinall; A R Hill; B Dhillon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Effectiveness of a smartphone application for testing near visual acuity.

Authors:  S Tofigh; E Shortridge; A Elkeeb; B F Godley
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability?

Authors:  M E McClure; P M Hart; A J Jackson; M R Stevenson; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Differences in reading performance of patients with Drusen maculopathy and subretinal fibrosis after CNV.

Authors:  Sibylla Richter-Mueksch; Michael Stur; Eva Stifter; Wolfgang Radner
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  The effects of aging vitreous on contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Giancarlo A Garcia; Matin Khoshnevis; Kenneth M P Yee; Justin H Nguyen; Jeannie Nguyen-Cuu; Alfredo A Sadun; J Sebag
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; N Jeremy Hill; Melis S Tuzun; Nazia M Alam; Jason B Carmel; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.