Literature DB >> 12049346

Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Peter J Bex1, Walter Makous.   

Abstract

We examined contrast sensitivity and suprathreshold apparent contrast with natural images. The spatial-frequency components within single octaves of the images were removed (notch filtered), their phases were randomized, or the polarity of the images was inverted. Of Michelson contrast, root-mean-square (RMS) contrast, and band-limited contrast, RMS contrast was the best index of detectability. Negative images had lower apparent contrast than their positives. Contrast detection thresholds showed spatial-frequency-dependent elevation following both notch filtering and phase randomization. The peak of the spatial-frequency tuning function was approximately 0.5-2 cycles per degree (c/deg). Suprathreshold contrast matching functions also showed spatial-frequency-dependent contrast loss for both notch-filtered and phase-randomized images. The peak of the spatial-frequency tuning function was approximately 1-3 c/deg. There was no detectable difference between the effects of phase randomization and notch filtering on contrast sensitivity. We argue that these observations are consistent with changes in the activity within spatial-frequency channels caused by the higher-order phase structure of natural images that is responsible for the presence of edges and specularities.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049346     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.19.001096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  59 in total

1.  Decoding natural signals from the peripheral retina.

Authors:  Brian C McCann; Mary M Hayhoe; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Image statistics of the environment surrounding freely behaving hoverflies.

Authors:  Olga Dyakova; Martin M Müller; Martin Egelhaaf; Karin Nordström
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: bridging the continuum between background matching and disruptive coloration.

Authors:  R T Hanlon; C-C Chiao; L M Mäthger; A Barbosa; K C Buresch; C Chubb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Perceived contrast in complex images.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Representation of cross-frequency spatial phase relationships in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Linda Henriksson; Aapo Hyvärinen; Simo Vanni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Objective measurement of visual resolution using the P300 to self-facial images.

Authors:  David J Marhöfer; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Sensitivity to gaze-contingent contrast increments in naturalistic movies: An exploratory report and model comparison.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Michael Dorr; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  A review of visual perception mechanisms that regulate rapid adaptive camouflage in cuttlefish.

Authors:  Chuan-Chin Chiao; Charles Chubb; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.

Authors:  Michaela Rohr; Johannes Tröger; Nils Michely; Alarith Uhde; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

10.  Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video.

Authors:  Andrew Haun; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 2.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.