Literature DB >> 16356081

A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast.

Andrew B Watson1, Albert J Ahumada.   

Abstract

The ModelFest data set was created to provide a public source of data to test and calibrate models of foveal spatial contrast detection. It consists of contrast thresholds for 43 foveal achromatic contrast stimuli collected from each of 16 observers. We have fit these data with a variety of simple models that include one of several contrast sensitivity functions, an oblique effect, a spatial sensitivity aperture, spatial frequency channels, and nonlinear Minkowski summation. While we are able to identify one model, with particular parameters, as providing the lowest overall residual error, we also note that the differences among several good-fitting models are small. We find a strong reciprocity between the size of the spatial aperture and the value of the summation exponent: both are effective means of limiting the extent of spatial summation. The results demonstrate the power of simple models to account for the visibility of a wide variety of spatial stimuli and suggest that special mechanisms to deal with special classes of stimuli are not needed. But the results also illustrate the limited power of even this large data set to distinguish among similar competing models. We identify one model as a possible standard, suitable for simple theoretical and applied predictions.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16356081     DOI: 10.1167/5.9.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  62 in total

1.  From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far?

Authors:  Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities.

Authors:  John M Foley; Srinivasa Varadharajan; Chin C Koh; Mylene C Q Farias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Frequency-based heuristics for material perception.

Authors:  Martin Giesel; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Training in contrast detection improves motion perception of sinewave gratings in amblyopia.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Liming Tao; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  How arousal modulates the visual contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Lee; Jongsoo Baek; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.