Literature DB >> 24799622

A double dissociation of the acuity and crowding limits to letter identification, and the promise of improved visual screening.

Shuang Song1, Dennis M Levi, Denis G Pelli.   

Abstract

Here, we systematically explore the size and spacing requirements for identifying a letter among other letters. We measure acuity for flanked and unflanked letters, centrally and peripherally, in normals and amblyopes. We find that acuity, overlap masking, and crowding each demand a minimum size or spacing for readable text. Just measuring flanked and unflanked acuity is enough for our proposed model to predict the observer's threshold size and spacing for letters at any eccentricity. We also find that amblyopia in adults retains the character of the childhood condition that caused it. Amblyopia is a developmental neural deficit that can occur as a result of either strabismus or anisometropia in childhood. Peripheral viewing during childhood due to strabismus results in amblyopia that is crowding limited, like peripheral vision. Optical blur of one eye during childhood due to anisometropia without strabismus results in amblyopia that is acuity limited, like blurred vision. Furthermore, we find that the spacing:acuity ratio of flanked and unflanked acuity can distinguish strabismic amblyopia from purely anisometropic amblyopia in nearly perfect agreement with lack of stereopsis. A scatter diagram of threshold spacing versus acuity, one point per patient, for several diagnostic groups, reveals the diagnostic power of flanked acuity testing. These results and two demonstrations indicate that the sensitivity of visual screening tests can be improved by using flankers that are more tightly spaced and letter like. Finally, in concert with Strappini, Pelli, Di Pace, and Martelli (submitted), we jointly report a double dissociation between acuity and crowding. Two clinical conditions-anisometropic amblyopia and apperceptive agnosia-each selectively impair either acuity A or the spacing:acuity ratio S/A, not both. Furthermore, when we specifically estimate crowding, we find a double dissociation between acuity and crowding. Models of human object recognition will need to accommodate this newly discovered independence of acuity and crowding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acuity; amblyopia; anisometropic; critical spacing; crowding; legibility; letter identification; object recognition; overlap masking; screening; spacing:acuity ratio; strabismic; threshold spacing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24799622      PMCID: PMC4021854          DOI: 10.1167/14.5.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  101 in total

1.  Visual acuity tests using chart, line, and single optotype in healthy and amblyopic children.

Authors:  Y Morad; E Werker; P Nemet
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Contour integration in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  R F Hess; R Demanins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Preschool vision screening.

Authors:  S K Snowdon; S L Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  R J Watt; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial filters and the localization of luminance changes in human vision.

Authors:  R J Watt; M J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; A P Aitsebaomo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Seeing with profoundly deactivated mid-level visual areas: non-hierarchical functioning in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Anat Perry; Yoram Bonneh; Rafael Malach; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Developmental changes in the visual span for reading.

Authors:  Miyoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge; Brock R Dubbels
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Infant hyperopia: detection, distribution, changes and correlates-outcomes from the cambridge infant screening programs.

Authors:  Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick; Marko Nardini; Shirley Anker
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  34 in total

1.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in amblyopia: Limitations on fixation stability and acuity?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Girish Kumar; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Stimulus conflation and tuning selectivity in V4 neurons: a model of visual crowding.

Authors:  Brad C Motter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Comment on the article: multifocal electroretinography in amblyopia.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš; Mladen Bušić; Ana Križanović; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Discriminating anisometropic amblyopia from myopia based on interocular inhibition.

Authors:  Wuli Jia; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Luis A Lesmes; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Size or spacing: which limits letter recognition in people with age-related macular degeneration?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Martin Szinte; Bilge Sayim; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Manuela Bossi; Catey Bunce; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.