Literature DB >> 2771334

High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population.

B Brown1, J E Lovie-Kitchin.   

Abstract

Visual acuities obtained with a high contrast Bailey-Lovie chart (HCBL) and a low contrast Bailey-Lovie chart (LCBL) were compared with clinical contrast sensitivity function (CSF) measurements in a group of normal subjects with a wide range of refractive errors. We found high and significant correlations for the measurements obtained with the visual acuity tests, and between measurements obtained with the acuity tests and the CSF chart. These results indicate that the CSF test provides little additional information as a screening test in routine practice, and could probably be restricted in its use to patients in whom ocular disease is suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2771334     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198907000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  11 in total

1.  Relation between perceived driving disability and scores of vision screening tests.

Authors:  L J van Rijn; H Wilhelm; M Emesz; R Kaper; S Heine; S Nitsch; G Grabner; H J Völker-Dieben
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Detection of hidden visual loss in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Leys; C M Candaele; A F De Rouck; J V Odom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Measuring contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  High- and Low-contrast Letter Acuity during Image Motion in Normal Observers and Observers with Infantile Nystagmus Syndrome.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Sop Song
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.106

6.  Gradiate: A radial sweep approach to measuring detailed contrast sensitivity functions from eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; Nazia M Alam; N Jeremy Hill; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Quantification of the Dynamic Visual Acuity Space at Real-World Luminances and Contrasts: The VA-CAL Test.

Authors:  Julian Hilmers; Torsten Straßer; Michael Bach; Katarina Stingl; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  The Ohio Contrast Cards: Visual Performance in a Pediatric Low-vision Site.

Authors:  Gregory R Hopkins; Bradley E Dougherty; Angela M Brown
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Relationship of Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function With Other Visual Functions in a Low Vision Population.

Authors:  Amritha Stalin; Kristine Dalton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Clinical Factors Associated with Low-Contrast Visual Acuity after Reduced-Fluence Photodynamic Therapy in Patients with Resolved Central Serous Chorioretinopathy and Good Baseline Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Aya Chubachi; Akiko Miki; Mayuka Hayashida; Mari Sakamoto; Hisanori Imai; Sentaro Kusuhara; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.