PURPOSE: Time-of-flight (TOF) MR imaging is clinically among the most common cerebral noncontrast enhanced MR angiography techniques allowing for high spatial resolution. As shown by several groups TOF contrast significantly improves at ultrahigh field of B0 = 7T, however, spatially varying transmit B1 (B1 (+)) fields at 7T reduce TOF contrast uniformity, typically resulting in suboptimal contrast and reduced vessel conspicuity in the brain periphery. METHODS: Using a 16-channel B1 (+) shimming system, we compare different dynamically applied B1 (+) phase shimming approaches on the radiofrequency excitation to improve contrast homogeneity for a (0.5 mm)(3) resolution multislab TOF acquisition. In addition, B1 (+) shimming applied on the venous saturation pulse was investigated to improve venous suppression, subcutaneous fat signal reduction and enhanced background suppression originating from MT effect. RESULTS: B1 (+) excitation homogeneity was improved by a factor 2.2-2.6 on average depending on the shimming approach, compared to a standard CP-like phase setting, leading to improved vessel conspicuity particularly in the periphery. Stronger saturation, higher fat suppression and improved background suppression were observed when dynamically applying B1 (+) shimming on the venous saturation pulse. CONCLUSION: B1+ shimming can significantly improve high resolution TOF vascular investigations at ultrahigh field, holding strong promise for non contrast-enhanced clinical applications.
PURPOSE: Time-of-flight (TOF) MR imaging is clinically among the most common cerebral noncontrast enhanced MR angiography techniques allowing for high spatial resolution. As shown by several groups TOF contrast significantly improves at ultrahigh field of B0 = 7T, however, spatially varying transmit B1 (B1 (+)) fields at 7T reduce TOF contrast uniformity, typically resulting in suboptimal contrast and reduced vessel conspicuity in the brain periphery. METHODS: Using a 16-channel B1 (+) shimming system, we compare different dynamically applied B1 (+) phase shimming approaches on the radiofrequency excitation to improve contrast homogeneity for a (0.5 mm)(3) resolution multislab TOF acquisition. In addition, B1 (+) shimming applied on the venous saturation pulse was investigated to improve venous suppression, subcutaneous fat signal reduction and enhanced background suppression originating from MT effect. RESULTS: B1 (+) excitation homogeneity was improved by a factor 2.2-2.6 on average depending on the shimming approach, compared to a standard CP-like phase setting, leading to improved vessel conspicuity particularly in the periphery. Stronger saturation, higher fat suppression and improved background suppression were observed when dynamically applying B1 (+) shimming on the venous saturation pulse. CONCLUSION:B1+ shimming can significantly improve high resolution TOF vascular investigations at ultrahigh field, holding strong promise for non contrast-enhanced clinical applications.
Authors: Johannes T Heverhagen; Eric Bourekas; Steffen Sammet; Michael V Knopp; Petra Schmalbrock Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Małgorzata Marjańska; Edward J Auerbach; Romain Valabrègue; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Michael Garwood Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Kawin Setsompop; Vijayanand Alagappan; Borjan Gagoski; Thomas Witzel; Jonathan Polimeni; Andreas Potthast; Franz Hebrank; Ulrich Fontius; Franz Schmitt; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Sebastian Schmitter; Edward J Auerbach; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Frank Godenschweger; Daniel Stucht; Falk Lüsebrink; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoping Wu; Xiaotong Zhang; Jinfeng Tian; Sebastian Schmitter; Brian Hanna; John Strupp; Josef Pfeuffer; Michael Hamm; Dingxin Wang; Juergen Nistler; Bin He; Thomas J Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Sebastian Schmitter; Xiaoping Wu; Edward J Auerbach; Gregor Adriany; Josef Pfeuffer; Michael Hamm; Kâmil Uğurbil; Pierre-François van de Moortele Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Falk Lüsebrink; Hendrik Mattern; Renat Yakupov; Julio Acosta-Cabronero; Mohammad Ashtarayeh; Steffen Oeltze-Jafra; Oliver Speck Journal: Sci Data Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 6.444