Literature DB >> 23629508

Neurometric amplitude-modulation detection threshold in the guinea-pig ventral cochlear nucleus.

Mark Sayles1, Christian Füllgrabe, Ian M Winter.   

Abstract

Amplitude modulation (AM) is a pervasive feature of natural sounds. Neural detection and processing of modulation cues is behaviourally important across species. Although most ecologically relevant sounds are not fully modulated, physiological studies have usually concentrated on fully modulated (100% modulation depth) signals. Psychoacoustic experiments mainly operate at low modulation depths, around detection threshold (∼5% AM). We presented sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones, systematically varying modulation depth between zero and 100%, at a range of modulation frequencies, to anaesthetised guinea-pigs while recording spikes from neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). The cochlear nucleus is the site of the first synapse in the central auditory system. At this locus significant signal processing occurs with respect to representation of AM signals. Spike trains were analysed in terms of the vector strength of spike synchrony to the amplitude envelope. Neurons showed either low-pass or band-pass temporal modulation transfer functions, with the proportion of band-pass responses increasing with increasing sound level. The proportion of units showing a band-pass response varies with unit type: sustained chopper (CS) > transient chopper (CT) > primary-like (PL). Spike synchrony increased with increasing modulation depth. At the lowest modulation depth (6%), significant spike synchrony was only observed near to the unit's best modulation frequency for all unit types tested. Modulation tuning therefore became sharper with decreasing modulation depth. AM detection threshold was calculated for each individual unit as a function of modulation frequency. Chopper units have significantly better AM detection thresholds than do primary-like units. AM detection threshold is significantly worse at 40 dB vs. 10 dB above pure-tone spike rate threshold. Mean modulation detection thresholds for sounds 10 dB above pure-tone spike rate threshold at best modulation frequency are (95% CI) 11.6% (10.0-13.1) for PL units, 9.8% (8.2-11.5) for CT units, and 10.8% (8.4-13.2) for CS units. The most sensitive guinea-pig VCN single unit AM detection thresholds are similar to human psychophysical performance (∼3% AM), while the mean neurometric thresholds approach whole animal behavioural performance (∼10% AM).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23629508      PMCID: PMC3717235          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.253062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  59 in total

1.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Sid P Bacon; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural representations of sinusoidal amplitude and frequency modulations in the primary auditory cortex of awake primates.

Authors:  Li Liang; Thomas Lu; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reverberation challenges the temporal representation of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds.

Authors:  I Nelken; Y Rotman; O Bar Yosef
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Amplitude modulation depth discrimination of a sinusoidal carrier: effect of stimulus duration.

Authors:  J Lee; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  M J Hewitt; R Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comment on "Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91,2156-2164 (1992)].

Authors:  A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  W S Rhode; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Behavioral limits of auditory temporal resolution in the rat: amplitude modulation and duration discrimination.

Authors:  Jack B Kelly; James E Cooke; Patrick C Gilbride; Craig Mitchell; Huiming Zhang
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Responses of auditory-nerve fibres.

Authors:  O Gleich; G M Klump
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural coding of sound envelope in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Michaël C C Slama; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multisensory Integration Enhances Temporal Coding in Ventral Cochlear Nucleus Bushy Cells.

Authors:  Amarins N Heeringa; Calvin Wu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams; Johanna Forst; Matthew J Mender; Erikson G Neilans; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-20

4.  Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells.

Authors:  Adam Hockley; Calvin Wu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.228

5.  Neural correlates of behavioral amplitude modulation sensitivity in the budgerigar midbrain.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Erikson G Neilans; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Psychophysical and modeling approaches towards determining the cochlear phase response based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Descending pathways generate perception of and neural responses to weak sensory input.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Chengjie G Huang; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Perfidious synaptic transmission in the guinea-pig auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Stasiak; Mark Sayles; Ian M Winter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.