Literature DB >> 8201111

A computer model of amplitude-modulation sensitivity of single units in the inferior colliculus.

M J Hewitt1, R Meddis.   

Abstract

A computer model is presented of a neural circuit that replicates amplitude-modulation (AM) sensitivity of cells in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). The ICC cell is modeled as a point neuron whose input consists of spike trains from a number of simulated ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) chopper cells. Input to the VCN chopper cells is provided by simulated spike trains from a model of the auditory periphery [Hewitt et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2096-2109 (1992)]. The performance of the model at the output of the auditory nerve, the cochlear nucleus and ICC simulations in response to amplitude-modulated stimuli is described. The results are presented in terms of both temporal and rate modulation transfer functions (MTFs) and compared with data from physiological studies in the literature. Qualitative matches were obtained to the following main empirical findings: (a) Auditory nerve temporal-MTFs are low pass, (b) VCN chopper temporal-MTFs are low pass at low signal levels and bandpass at moderate and high signal levels, (c) ICC unit temporal-MTFs are low pass at low signal levels and broadly tuned bandpass at moderate and high signal levels, and (d) ICC unit rate-MTFs are sharply tuned bandpass at low and moderate signal levels and flat at high levels. VCN and ICC units preferentially sensitive to different rates of modulation are presented. The model supports the hypothesis that cells in the ICC decode temporal information into a rate code [Langner and Schreiner, J. Neurophysiol. 60, 1799-1822 (1988)], and provides a candidate wiring diagram of how this may be achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8201111     DOI: 10.1121/1.408676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A modeling study of the responses of the lateral superior olive to ipsilateral sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Le Wang; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13

2.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Prevalence of stereotypical responses to mistuned complex tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li; David S Velenovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Improving the dynamics of responses to amplitude modulated stimuli by modeling inhibitory interneurons in cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Pierre Dugué; Régine Le Bouquin Jeannès; Gérard Faucon
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

7.  Maximum decoding abilities of temporal patterns and synchronized firings: application to auditory neurons responding to click trains and amplitude modulated white noise.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  A modeling study of the effects of membrane afterhyperpolarization on spike interval statistics and on ILD encoding in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of sound direction on the processing of amplitude-modulated signals in the frog inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J Xu; D M Gooler; A S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Idealized computational models for auditory receptive fields.

Authors:  Tony Lindeberg; Anders Friberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.