Literature DB >> 9193056

Amplitude modulation depth discrimination of a sinusoidal carrier: effect of stimulus duration.

J Lee1, S P Bacon.   

Abstract

Discrimination of the change in depth of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) was investigated as a function of stimulus duration. The carrier frequency was 4000 Hz, the standard modulation depth (m) was either 0.1, 0.18, or 0.3, and the modulation rate was either 10, 20, 40, or 80 Hz. For all standard depths and modulation rates, threshold (delta m) decreased by more than a factor o two as stimulus duration doubled from the shortest duration used up to a certain duration (critical duration), beyond which the threshold decreased only slightly or remained constant. The critical duration corresponded to about four cycles of modulation. Psychometric functions were measured for different stimulus durations to examine the extent to which a multiple-looks model could explain the present data. This model provided a reasonable prediction of the change in AM depth discrimination threshold as a function of stimulus duration.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193056      PMCID: PMC3282190          DOI: 10.1121/1.418329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Discrimination of modulation depth of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) noise.

Authors:  G H Wakefield; N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal integration in amplitude modulation detection.

Authors:  S Sheft; W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal integration and multiple looks.

Authors:  N F Viemeister; G H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Across-channel masking of changes in modulation depth for amplitude- and frequency-modulated signals.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; T Gaunt; T Child
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On measuring psychometric functions: a comparison of the constant-stimulus and adaptive up-down methods.

Authors:  H Dai
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Amplitude modulation rate discrimination with sinusoidal carriers.

Authors:  J Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contribution of onset/offset information of modulation to amplitude modulation depth discrimination.

Authors:  Derek R Edwards; Jungmee Lee; Jennifer Andrews; Aileen Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

7.  Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Nigel C Noriega; Elizabeth A Marshall; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Parietal Cortex Is Required for the Integration of Acoustic Evidence.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Justin Gimoto; Christine M Constantinople; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Temporal codes for amplitude contrast in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.

Authors:  Ning-ji He; John H Mills; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.