Literature DB >> 27766433

Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Kenneth S Henry1, Kristina S Abrams2, Johanna Forst3, Matthew J Mender3, Erikson G Neilans4, Fabio Idrobo5,6, Laurel H Carney3,2.   

Abstract

Vowels make a strong contribution to speech perception under natural conditions. Vowels are encoded in the auditory nerve primarily through neural synchrony to temporal fine structure and to envelope fluctuations rather than through average discharge rate. Neural synchrony is thought to contribute less to vowel coding in central auditory nuclei, consistent with more limited synchronization to fine structure and the emergence of average-rate coding of envelope fluctuations. However, this hypothesis is largely unexplored, especially in background noise. The present study examined coding mechanisms at the level of the midbrain that support behavioral sensitivity to simple vowel-like sounds using neurophysiological recordings and matched behavioral experiments in the budgerigar. Stimuli were harmonic tone complexes with energy concentrated at one spectral peak, or formant frequency, presented in quiet and in noise. Behavioral thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination decreased with increasing amplitude of stimulus envelope fluctuations, increased in noise, and were similar between budgerigars and humans. Multiunit recordings in awake birds showed that the midbrain encodes vowel-like sounds both through response synchrony to envelope structure and through average rate. Whereas neural discrimination thresholds based on either coding scheme were sufficient to support behavioral thresholds in quiet, only synchrony-based neural thresholds could account for behavioral thresholds in background noise. These results reveal an incomplete transformation to average-rate coding of vowel-like sounds in the midbrain. Model simulations suggest that this transformation emerges due to modulation tuning, which is shared between birds and mammals. Furthermore, the results underscore the behavioral relevance of envelope synchrony in the midbrain for detection of small differences in vowel formant frequency under real-world listening conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  average rate; budgerigar; formant frequency discrimination; fundamental frequency; inferior colliculus; synchronized rate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27766433      PMCID: PMC5243265          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0594-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  58 in total

1.  Neural spike sorting under nearly 0-dB signal-to-noise ratio using nonlinear energy operator and artificial neural-network classifier.

Authors:  K H Kim; S J Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Encoding of vowel-like sounds in the auditory nerve: model predictions of discrimination performance.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling.

Authors:  G A Manley; O Gleich; H J Leppelsack; H Oeckinghaus
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  GABAergic inputs shape responses to amplitude modulated stimuli in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Donald M Caspary; Peggy Shadduck Palombi; Larry F Hughes
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Phoneme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nima Mesgarani; Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Responses of auditory-nerve fibres.

Authors:  O Gleich; G M Klump
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectrotemporal sound preferences of neighboring inferior colliculus neurons: implications for local circuitry and processing.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Francisco C Rodriguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  15 in total

1.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Joyce M McDonough
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch of harmonic complex tones: rate and temporal coding of envelope repetition rate in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbits.

Authors:  Yaqing Su; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  Persistent Auditory Nerve Damage Following Kainic Acid Excitotoxicity in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.