Literature DB >> 16719587

Behavioral limits of auditory temporal resolution in the rat: amplitude modulation and duration discrimination.

Jack B Kelly1, James E Cooke, Patrick C Gilbride, Craig Mitchell, Huiming Zhang.   

Abstract

Thresholds for detecting the presence of amplitude modulation in a noise carrier were determined for rats using conditioned avoidance procedures. There was a progressive increase in threshold with modulation rates between 5 Hz and 2 kHz. Further tests were conducted to determine difference thresholds for detecting an increase in modulation rate for standard rates of 10, 50, and 100 Hz. The size of the difference threshold increased progressively as the standard rate increased. In addition, thresholds for detecting an increase in the duration of a noise burst were determined for various standard durations. The difference thresholds were constant for values between 10 and 50 ms but increased progressively, with standard durations between 0.1 and 1.0 s. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719587     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.120.2.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  21 in total

1.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Prolonged maturation of auditory perception and learning in gerbils.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  Neural spike-timing patterns vary with sound shape and periodicity in three auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  Christopher M Lee; Ahmad F Osman; Maxim Volgushev; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A Hierarchy of Time Scales for Discriminating and Classifying the Temporal Shape of Sound in Three Auditory Cortical Fields.

Authors:  Ahmad F Osman; Christopher M Lee; Monty A Escabí; Heather L Read
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cortical Synaptic Inhibition Declines during Auditory Learning.

Authors:  Emma C Sarro; Gardiner von Trapp; Todd M Mowery; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A sensitive period for the impact of hearing loss on auditory perception.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Emma C Sarro; Francis A M Manno; Ramanjot Kang; Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Amplitude modulation transfer functions reveal opposing populations within both the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Laurel Carney; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Koivuniemi; Seth J Wilks; Andrew J Woolley; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.