Literature DB >> 25762687

Neural coding of sound envelope in reverberant environments.

Michaël C C Slama1, Bertrand Delgutte2.   

Abstract

Speech reception depends critically on temporal modulations in the amplitude envelope of the speech signal. Reverberation encountered in everyday environments can substantially attenuate these modulations. To assess the effect of reverberation on the neural coding of amplitude envelope, we recorded from single units in the inferior colliculus (IC) of unanesthetized rabbit using sinusoidally amplitude modulated (AM) broadband noise stimuli presented in simulated anechoic and reverberant environments. Although reverberation degraded both rate and temporal coding of AM in IC neurons, in most neurons, the degradation in temporal coding was smaller than the AM attenuation in the stimulus. This compensation could largely be accounted for by the compressive shape of the modulation input-output function (MIOF), which describes the nonlinear transformation of modulation depth from acoustic stimuli into neural responses. Additionally, in a subset of neurons, the temporal coding of AM was better for reverberant stimuli than for anechoic stimuli having the same modulation depth at the ear. Using hybrid anechoic stimuli that selectively possess certain properties of reverberant sounds, we show that this reverberant advantage is not caused by envelope distortion, static interaural decorrelation, or spectral coloration. Overall, our results suggest that the auditory system may possess dual mechanisms that make the coding of amplitude envelope relatively robust in reverberation: one general mechanism operating for all stimuli with small modulation depths, and another mechanism dependent on very specific properties of reverberant stimuli, possibly the periodic fluctuations in interaural correlation at the modulation frequency.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/354452-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; envelope; inferior colliculus; reverberation; single-unit; unanesthetized rabbit

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762687      PMCID: PMC4355207          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3615-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  61 in total

1.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Responses of chinchilla inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated tones with different envelopes.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Jennifer Henderson; Hongzhe Li; Guang-Di Chen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

3.  Sensitivity to interaural correlation of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Robert H Arnott; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

4.  The representation of amplitude modulations in the mammalian auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Bjarne Krebs; Nicholas A Lesica; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Amplitude modulation detection by human listeners in reverberant sound fields: Carrier bandwidth effects and binaural versus monaural comparison.

Authors:  Pavel Zahorik; Duck O Kim; Shigeyuki Kuwada; Paul W Anderson; Eugene Brandewie; Regina Collecchia; Nirmal Srinivasan
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2012-06-01

6.  Interaural phase-sensitive units in the inferior colliculus of the unanesthetized rabbit: effects of changing frequency.

Authors:  S Kuwada; T R Stanford; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Eighth nerve fiber firing features in normal-hearing rabbits.

Authors:  E Borg; B Engström; G Linde; K Marklund
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  K S Helfer
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-04

9.  Neural encoding of amplitude modulation within the auditory midbrain of squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  P Müller-Preuss; C Flachskamm; A Bieser
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Neurometric amplitude-modulation detection threshold in the guinea-pig ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Christian Füllgrabe; Ian M Winter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  11 in total

1.  Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Temporal Envelope Coding by Inferior Colliculus Neurons with Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Martin F McKinney; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-17

3.  Neural coding of time-varying interaural time differences and time-varying amplitude in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Nathaniel Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Statistics of natural reverberation enable perceptual separation of sound and space.

Authors:  James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Speech intelligibility in rooms: Disrupting the effect of prior listening exposure.

Authors:  Eugene J Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Paul W Anderson; Ashley A Assgari; Gregory M Ellis; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cortical adaptation to sound reverberation.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; Kerry M M Walker; Nicol S Harper; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Andrew J King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 8.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Rabbits use both spectral and temporal cues to discriminate the fundamental frequency of harmonic complexes with missing fundamentals.

Authors:  Joseph D Wagner; Alice Gelman; Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Reverberation impairs brainstem temporal representations of voiced vowel sounds: challenging "periodicity-tagged" segregation of competing speech in rooms.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.