Literature DB >> 26843608

Neural correlates of behavioral amplitude modulation sensitivity in the budgerigar midbrain.

Kenneth S Henry1, Erikson G Neilans2, Kristina S Abrams3, Fabio Idrobo4, Laurel H Carney5.   

Abstract

Amplitude modulation (AM) is a crucial feature of many communication signals, including speech. Whereas average discharge rates in the auditory midbrain correlate with behavioral AM sensitivity in rabbits, the neural bases of AM sensitivity in species with human-like behavioral acuity are unexplored. Here, we used parallel behavioral and neurophysiological experiments to explore the neural (midbrain) bases of AM perception in an avian speech mimic, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus). Behavioral AM sensitivity was quantified using operant conditioning procedures. Neural AM sensitivity was studied using chronically implanted microelectrodes in awake, unrestrained birds. Average discharge rates of multiunit recording sites in the budgerigar midbrain were insufficient to explain behavioral sensitivity to modulation frequencies <100 Hz for both tone- and noise-carrier stimuli, even with optimal pooling of information across recording sites. Neural envelope synchrony, in contrast, could explain behavioral performance for both carrier types across the full range of modulation frequencies studied (16-512 Hz). The results suggest that envelope synchrony in the budgerigar midbrain may underlie behavioral sensitivity to AM. Behavioral AM sensitivity based on synchrony in the budgerigar, which contrasts with rate-correlated behavioral performance in rabbits, raises the possibility that envelope synchrony, rather than average discharge rate, might also underlie AM perception in other species with sensitive AM detection abilities, including humans. These results highlight the importance of synchrony coding of envelope structure in the inferior colliculus. Furthermore, they underscore potential benefits of devices (e.g., midbrain implants) that evoke robust neural synchrony.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; auditory midbrain; budgerigar; envelope synchrony; inferior colliculus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26843608      PMCID: PMC4869485          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01003.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Neural spike sorting under nearly 0-dB signal-to-noise ratio using nonlinear energy operator and artificial neural-network classifier.

Authors:  K H Kim; S J Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  B S Krishna; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  A Rees; A R Møller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling.

Authors:  G A Manley; O Gleich; H J Leppelsack; H Oeckinghaus
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vocal production mechanisms in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): the presence and implications of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  P B Lavenex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural encoding of amplitude modulation within the auditory midbrain of squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  P Müller-Preuss; C Flachskamm; A Bieser
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris): II. Responses of auditory-nerve fibres.

Authors:  O Gleich; G M Klump
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectrotemporal sound preferences of neighboring inferior colliculus neurons: implications for local circuitry and processing.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Francisco C Rodriguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.492

View more
  12 in total

1.  Neural coding of time-varying interaural time differences and time-varying amplitude in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Nathaniel Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Midbrain Synchrony to Envelope Structure Supports Behavioral Sensitivity to Single-Formant Vowel-Like Sounds in Noise.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams; Johanna Forst; Matthew J Mender; Erikson G Neilans; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-20

4.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Normal Tone-In-Noise Sensitivity in Trained Budgerigars despite Substantial Auditory-Nerve Injury: No Evidence of Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Identifying cues for tone-in-noise detection using decision variable correlation in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Amplitude Modulation Detection in Children with a History of Temporary Conductive Hearing Loss Remains Impaired for Years After Restoration of Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Margo McKenna Benoit; Mark Orlando; Kenneth Henry; Paul Allen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-17

8.  Persistent Auditory Nerve Damage Following Kainic Acid Excitotoxicity in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kristina S Abrams
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Effects of Kainic Acid-Induced Auditory Nerve Damage on Envelope-Following Responses in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  John L Wilson; Kristina S Abrams; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-19

10.  Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.

Authors:  Yingxuan Wang; Kristina S Abrams; Laurel H Carney; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.