Literature DB >> 23598846

Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Lynne T Penberthy1, Bassam A Dahman, Valentina I Petkov, Jonathan P DeShazo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determining eligibility for a clinical trial (CT) typically requires a lengthy manual review of data for a single evaluation. The cost associated with eligibility screening is typically not compensated through contracts supporting CTs.
METHODS: We used a real-time tracking system that captures CT evaluations and provides information on evaluation outcomes and time spent on each eligibility screening by research staff. Using these data, we describe the effort and costs of eligibility screening overall and per enrolled patient for cancer CTs. The study sample included all completed eligibility assessment (evaluation) records for the 18-month study period. We used generalized multinomial modeling to predict evaluation outcomes and then used the resulting parameter coefficients to estimate the effort associated with each participant, adjusted for probability of being enrolled. From these data, we calculated cost associated with eligibility screening.
RESULTS: We found substantial variation in attributed cost by study type and phase. The cost of eligibility screening ranged by study phase from $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient. The estimated annual cost of screening was more than $90,000.
CONCLUSION: This study provides results based on prospectively captured effort to estimate the largely nonreimbursed costs of eligibility screening and suggests that screening can be a significant financial burden to an institution. Centers performing CTs may need to acknowledge the differences in screening costs for different study types when negotiating contracts with funding organizations. Information such as that captured here could support such negotiations to reduce the gap between reimbursed and nonreimbursed costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23598846      PMCID: PMC3500483          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  28 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial.

Authors:  Georgia Robins Sadler; Celine M Ko; Vanessa L Malcarne; Rajni Banthia; Ivan Gutierrez; James W Varni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Recruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. a comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategies.

Authors:  S Folmar; F Oates-Williams; P Sharp; D Reboussin; J Smith; K Cheshire; J Macer; K Potvin Klein; D Herrington
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-02

4.  Strategies, time, and costs associated with the recruitment and enrollment of nursing home residents for a micronutrient supplementation clinical trial.

Authors:  Paula M Gismondi; Davidson H Hamer; Lynette S Leka; Gerard Dallal; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Simin N Meydani
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Effective and cost-effective clinical trial recruitment strategies for postmenopausal women in a community-based, primary care setting.

Authors:  Debra A Butt; Michael Lock; Bart J Harvey
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Recruitment strategies for minority participation: challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview.

Authors:  Janet Fulton Keyzer; Joy Melnikow; Miriam Kuppermann; Stephen Birch; Christina Kuenneth; Jim Nuovo; Rahman Azari; Debra Oto-Kent; Mairin Rooney
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children.

Authors:  Jodie L Robinson; Janene H Fuerch; Dana D Winiewicz; Sarah J Salvy; James N Roemmich; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of subject recruitment strategies in the HIPAA era: results from a colorectal cancer screening adherence trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Julie T Glick; Patricia Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Timothy C Heeren; Marianne Prout; Peter Davidson; John B Wong
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  John H Stewart; Alain G Bertoni; Jennifer L Staten; Edward A Levine; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of recruitment strategies in a community-based intervention study of HIV-infected persons.

Authors:  J Baigis; M E Francis; M Hoffman
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2003-10
View more
  26 in total

1.  Automatic data source identification for clinical trial eligibility criteria resolution.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Courtney Hebert; Kelly Regan; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Albert M Lai
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 2.  Challenges Facing Early Phase Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: An Analysis of Corrective Action Plans to Improve Accrual.

Authors:  Holly A Massett; Grace Mishkin; Larry Rubinstein; S Percy Ivy; Andrea Denicoff; Elizabeth Godwin; Kate DiPiazza; Jennifer Bolognese; James A Zwiebel; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Courtney Hebert; Marcelo Lopetegui; Marie-Catherine de Marneffe; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Cognitive Function Characterization Using Electronic Health Records Notes.

Authors:  Adrienne Pichon; Betina Idnay; Karen Marder; Rebecca Schnall; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  A Time-and-Motion Study of Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Huaxiu Tang; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Melanie Hounchell; Stephanie Kennebeck; Imre Solti; Yizhao Ni
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.454

6.  Automated determination of metastases in unstructured radiology reports for eligibility screening in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Valentina I Petkov; Lynne T Penberthy; Bassam A Dahman; Andrew Poklepovic; Chris W Gillam; James H McDermott
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2013-10-09

7.  Automated classification of eligibility criteria in clinical trials to facilitate patient-trial matching for specific patient populations.

Authors:  Kevin Zhang; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research.

Authors:  Betina Idnay; Caitlin Dreisbach; Chunhua Weng; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  ACE: the Advanced Cohort Engine for searching longitudinal patient records.

Authors:  Alison Callahan; Vladimir Polony; José D Posada; Juan M Banda; Saurabh Gombar; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  The use of electronic health records for recruitment in clinical trials: a mixed methods analysis of the Harmony Outcomes Electronic Health Record Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Emily C O'Brien; Sudha R Raman; Alicia Ellis; Bradley G Hammill; Lisa G Berdan; Tyrus Rorick; Salim Janmohamed; Zachary Lampron; Adrian F Hernandez; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.